Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Department of Neurology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
J Neurooncol. 2019 Sep;144(3):511-518. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03249-1. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
PURPOSE: Progressive disease in patients with high-grade glioma may be reflected in cognitive decline. However, the cognitive functions most sensitive to progression may differ between patients. We investigated whether decline on a personalized selection of tests predicted progressive disease according to RANO criteria in high-grade glioma patients. METHODS: Starting one day before surgery, patients underwent neuropsychological assessment every three months during standard treatment and clinical follow-up. We first made a personalized selection of three tests that showed the highest Reliable Change Index (RCI) values, i.e., most positive change, at the first post-surgical assessment for each patient. In subsequent follow up, a decline of RCI ≤ - 1 on at least two of the three tests in the selection was considered cognitive decline. We performed a discrete Cox proportional hazards model including a time-dependent coefficient cognitive decline (vs. stability) and covariate age to predict progressive disease. RESULTS: Twenty five patients were included. Cognitive decline on the personalized test selection preceded or had occurred by the time progression was established in 9/15 patients with RANO confirmed progressive disease (60%). Decline was absent in 8/10 patients (80%) with stable disease during participation. The independent hazard ratio for progression in case of cognitive decline was 5.05 (p < 0.01) compared to stable performance. CONCLUSIONS: Using only three patient-specific neuropsychological tests, we found a fivefold increased chance of disease progression in case of cognitive decline as compared to stable performance. Brief, patient-tailored cognitive assessment may be a noninvasive addition to disease monitoring without overburdening patients and clinical care.
目的:高级别胶质瘤患者的疾病进展可能反映在认知能力下降上。然而,患者之间对进展最敏感的认知功能可能不同。我们研究了根据 RANO 标准,高级别胶质瘤患者中,根据 RANO 标准,基于个性化选择的测试的下降是否可以预测进展性疾病。
方法:从手术前一天开始,患者在标准治疗和临床随访期间每三个月接受一次神经心理学评估。我们首先为每位患者在第一次手术后评估中选择三个具有最高可靠变化指数(RCI)值的测试,即最明显的阳性变化。在后续随访中,如果在个性化选择的三个测试中至少有两个测试的 RCI 值下降到≤-1,则认为存在认知下降。我们进行了离散 Cox 比例风险模型分析,包括一个时间依赖性的认知下降(与稳定相比)的系数和年龄作为协变量,以预测进展性疾病。
结果:共纳入 25 例患者。在 15 例经 RANO 证实的进展性疾病患者中,有 9 例(60%)出现了认知下降,且在进展确立之前或同时出现了认知下降。在参加研究期间,10 例疾病稳定的患者中(80%)没有认知下降。在认知下降的情况下,进展的独立风险比为 5.05(p<0.01),而稳定表现的风险比为 1.00。
结论:仅使用三个患者特定的神经心理学测试,我们发现认知下降的情况下疾病进展的可能性增加了五倍,而稳定表现的可能性为 1.00。简短的、针对患者的认知评估可能是疾病监测的无创性补充,不会给患者和临床护理带来过重负担。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014-8
J Neurosurg. 2012-8-31
J Neurooncol. 2013-10-31
J Neurosurg. 1994-2
J Neurosurg Sci. 2013-9
Neurooncol Adv. 2025-5-2
Neurol Clin. 2024-11
Neurooncol Pract. 2015-9
Future Oncol. 2017-11-30
J Neurooncol. 2016-9
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014-8
Brain. 2014-5-28
Psychol Med. 2014-7