Harvey I, Jenkins R, Llewellyn L
Health Care Evaluation Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health Medicine, Bristol.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993 Oct;47(5):368-72. doi: 10.1136/jech.47.5.368.
This study aimed to assess the appropriateness of bed use by determining patients' suitability for patient hotel accommodation and day treatment and by examining timeliness of discharge, and to assess patient and staff views about patient hotels.
Patients were assessed by a doctor and nurse in terms of an agreed case definition for patient hotel use. Patient suitability was validated and patient acceptability measured by semi-structured interviews with a random sample of patients judged suitable for hotel accommodation. All senior medical and nursing staff completed a further questionnaire.
The study took place at University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff (856 beds), and all specialties, except intensive care wards, participated.
Patients occupying a total of 3972 bed days, accumulated over seven randomly chosen census days, were studied.
Data were available for 88% of eligible inpatients. Ten per cent (405 of 3972) of patients were judged suitable for a patient hotel. Specialties indicating major use were obstetrics and gynaecology, general surgery, and general and geriatric medicine. Sixty three per cent (254 of 405) of these subjects required low level investigation or treatment. Preoperative and postoperative and antenatal patients were often suitable also. Three per cent (119 of 3972, 95% confidence interval 2.5, 3.6%) of inpatients were judged suitable for day treatment/investigation. Seventy nine per cent (291 of 369) of patients suitable for discharge were discharged on the same or the next day. The patient hotel idea was acceptable to 58 of 68 (85%) randomly selected patients and to 84 of 93 (90%) staff.
With allowance for non-response, our study indicates that a general hospital of this size generates the need (inpatients, relatives, and ward attenders) for a mean of 72 patient hotel beds. There is also residual scope for increasing day treatment/investigation and for releasing beds by speeding discharge. The patient hotel idea is highly acceptable to both patients and staff and should be widely considered as a means of making patient care more efficient.
本研究旨在通过确定患者是否适合入住患者酒店及日间治疗,并审查出院及时性来评估床位使用的合理性,同时评估患者和工作人员对患者酒店的看法。
由医生和护士根据商定的患者酒店使用病例定义对患者进行评估。通过对随机抽取的被判定适合入住酒店的患者进行半结构化访谈,验证患者的适用性并衡量患者的可接受性。所有高级医护人员完成了一份进一步的问卷。
该研究在威尔士大学医院(位于加的夫,有856张床位)进行,除重症监护病房外的所有专科都参与了研究。
研究了在七个随机选择的普查日累计占用3972个床日的患者。
88%的符合条件的住院患者有数据可用。10%(3972例中的405例)的患者被判定适合入住患者酒店。主要使用患者酒店的专科包括妇产科、普通外科以及普通内科和老年医学科。这些患者中有63%(405例中的254例)需要进行低水平的检查或治疗。术前、术后和产前患者通常也适合。3%(3972例中的119例,95%置信区间为2.5%,3.6%)的住院患者被判定适合日间治疗/检查。79%(369例中的291例)适合出院的患者在当天或次日出院。68名随机抽取的患者中有58名(85%)、93名工作人员中有84名(90%)接受患者酒店这一想法。
考虑到无应答情况,我们的研究表明,这样规模的综合医院平均需要72张患者酒店床位(住院患者、亲属和病房陪护人员)。增加日间治疗/检查以及通过加快出院来腾出床位仍有空间。患者酒店这一想法在患者和工作人员中都非常受欢迎,应被广泛视为提高患者护理效率的一种方式。