Saunders B P, Trewby P N
Department of Medicine, Darlington Memorial Hospital, Durham, UK.
Postgrad Med J. 1993 Oct;69(816):787-90. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.69.816.787.
To test the value of an outpatient visit in patients with dyspepsia, 79 patients considered suitable for open access endoscopy by their general practitioners were instead seen in the medical outpatient clinic first. In 35 patients immediate endoscopy was seen as an inappropriate investigation and 23 of these were spared endoscopy. In 11 patients important extra diagnoses were made in the clinic which would have been delayed or missed had the patients been sent straight for open access endoscopy. Sixty-eight per cent of patients, when asked by questionnaire, said they preferred to be seen in the clinic first rather than come for open access endoscopy. These results lend support to the traditional medical clinic appointment followed by endoscopy if and when appropriate rather than the open access endoscopy system.
为了测试门诊就诊对消化不良患者的价值,79名被全科医生认为适合直接进行内镜检查的患者,首先在门诊接受了诊治。在35名患者中,即时内镜检查被认为是不合适的检查方式,其中23名患者免于接受内镜检查。在11名患者中,门诊做出了重要的额外诊断,若这些患者直接被送去接受直接内镜检查,这些诊断可能会被延迟或遗漏。当通过问卷调查时,68%的患者表示他们更愿意先在门诊就诊,而不是直接来接受内镜检查。这些结果支持了传统的先预约门诊就诊,然后在适当的时候进行内镜检查的方式,而不是直接内镜检查系统。