Bramble M G
Department of General Medicine, Middlesbrough General Hospital, Cleveland.
Gut. 1992 Feb;33(2):282-5. doi: 10.1136/gut.33.2.282.
In a postal survey of 450 members of the Endoscopy Section of the British Society of Gastroenterology carried out during 1990, 47% of respondants stated that they were offering some form of open access endoscopy. Virtually all of these were offering open access gastroscopy, but one in three were also performing open access flexible sigmoidoscopy. Those units that offered open access endoscopy had significantly more endoscopists sharing the workload, including a greater number of clinical assistants. Only 10% of those who replied, however, were offering 'true' open access endoscopy, the remainder used some form of 'censoring'. There were also important differences in consultants' attitudes to the investigation and management of patients referred with dyspepsia, which may account for the patchy availability of the service. Some 71% of those who did not offer open access endoscopy cited an inability to cope with numbers as their main reason for not doing so. Support for these concerns is gained from the finding that 52% of those that offered the service have had a waiting list exceeding six weeks at some time. Nevertheless, open access endoscopy is becoming more widely available with a large increase in participating units during the past 12 months.
1990年对英国胃肠病学会内镜科450名成员进行的邮政调查显示,47%的受访者表示他们提供某种形式的开放获取式内镜检查。实际上,所有这些单位都提供开放获取式胃镜检查,但三分之一的单位也开展开放获取式乙状结肠镜检查。提供开放获取式内镜检查的单位有更多内镜医师分担工作量,包括更多的临床助理。然而,只有10%的受访者提供“真正的”开放获取式内镜检查,其余的采用某种形式的“审查”。顾问们对消化不良转诊患者的检查和管理态度也存在重要差异,这可能解释了该服务提供情况参差不齐的原因。约71%未提供开放获取式内镜检查的人表示,无法应对患者数量是他们不这样做的主要原因。52%提供该服务的单位曾在某个时候出现等候名单超过六周的情况,这一发现支持了这些担忧。尽管如此,开放获取式内镜检查正变得越来越普遍,在过去12个月里,参与的单位大幅增加。