• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氯雷他定糖浆与特非那定混悬液治疗儿童慢性过敏性皮肤病的疗效及安全性比较研究

Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of loratadine syrup and terfenadine suspension in the treatment of chronic allergic skin diseases in a pediatric population.

作者信息

Lutsky B N, Schuller J L, Cerio R, Chieira M L, Giannetti A, Gonçalves H M, deGroot L J, Vareltzides A, Guillot B, Lynde C W

机构信息

Schieland Hospital, Ba Schiedam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Arzneimittelforschung. 1993 Nov;43(11):1196-9.

PMID:8292064
Abstract

The safety and efficacy of loratadine (Sch 29851, CAS 79794-75-5) syrup (5 or 10 mg QD) was compared to terfenadine (CAS 50679-08-8) suspension (30 mg b.i.d.) in a randomized, third party blind, parallel-group, multicenter trial. Two hundred thirty-six children ages 6-12 years, with chronic allergic skin disorders were treated for 14 days. The predominant skin condition was atrophic dermatitis (88% of the efficacy population). Evaluation of efficacy was based on investigator and patient assessment of symptoms, overall condition of the disease, and therapeutic response to treatment. After 7 and 14 days of treatment, and in the endpoint analysis (last valid study visit for all patients) the decreases from baseline in mean total sign/symptom scores, and all individual symptoms, did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) between treatments. Itching improved 54% in the loratadine group and 58% in the terfenadine group in the endpoint analysis. Forty-five percent of patients treated with loratadine and 46% of terfenadine-treated patients treated had complete or marked relief of their symptoms at endpoint. The efficacy of loratadine increased during the study, suggesting that patients did not develop tolerance to the medication over the 14-day course of therapy. Mild to moderate treatment-related adverse experiences were reported in 7/113 patients (6%) treated with loratadine and 11/119 patients (9%) treated with terfenadine. Single daily doses of 5 mg or 10 mg loratadine syrup were comparable to terfenadine suspension 30 mg twice daily for improving the symptoms of chronic allergic skin disorders in children. Loratadine was safe and well tolerated.

摘要

在一项随机、第三方盲法、平行组、多中心试验中,比较了氯雷他定(Sch 29851,CAS 79794-75-5)糖浆(5或10毫克,每日一次)与特非那定(CAS 50679-08-8)混悬液(30毫克,每日两次)的安全性和有效性。236名6至12岁患有慢性过敏性皮肤病的儿童接受了14天的治疗。主要皮肤疾病为萎缩性皮炎(占疗效评估人群的88%)。疗效评估基于研究者和患者对症状、疾病总体状况以及治疗反应的评估。治疗7天和14天后,以及在终点分析(所有患者的最后一次有效研究访视)中,各治疗组平均总体征/症状评分及所有个体症状较基线的下降幅度无显著差异(p>0.05)。在终点分析中,氯雷他定组瘙痒改善了54%,特非那定组改善了58%。在终点时,接受氯雷他定治疗的患者中有45%、接受特非那定治疗的患者中有46%的症状得到完全或显著缓解。在研究期间氯雷他定的疗效有所提高,这表明患者在14天的治疗过程中未对该药物产生耐受性。接受氯雷他定治疗的113名患者中有7名(6%)、接受特非那定治疗的119名患者中有11名(9%)报告了轻度至中度的治疗相关不良事件。每日单次服用5毫克或10毫克氯雷他定糖浆与每日两次服用30毫克特非那定混悬液在改善儿童慢性过敏性皮肤病症状方面效果相当。氯雷他定安全且耐受性良好。

相似文献

1
Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of loratadine syrup and terfenadine suspension in the treatment of chronic allergic skin diseases in a pediatric population.氯雷他定糖浆与特非那定混悬液治疗儿童慢性过敏性皮肤病的疗效及安全性比较研究
Arzneimittelforschung. 1993 Nov;43(11):1196-9.
2
A comparative study of the efficacy and safety of loratadine syrup and terfenadine suspension in the treatment of 3- to 6-year-old children with seasonal allergic rhinitis.氯雷他定糖浆和特非那定混悬液治疗3至6岁季节性变应性鼻炎患儿疗效及安全性的比较研究
Clin Ther. 1993 Sep-Oct;15(5):855-65.
3
A multicentric study of loratadine, terfenadine and placebo in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.氯雷他定、特非那定与安慰剂治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的多中心研究。
Arzneimittelforschung. 1988 Jan;38(1):124-8.
4
Comparative effects of loratadine and terfenadine in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria.氯雷他定与特非那定治疗慢性特发性荨麻疹的对比疗效
Ann Allergy. 1990 Feb;64(2 Pt 2):191-4.
5
Efficacy and tolerability of loratadine versus fexofenadine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: a double-blind comparison with crossover treatment of nonresponders.氯雷他定与非索非那定治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效和耐受性:对无反应者交叉治疗的双盲比较
Clin Ther. 2000 Jun;22(6):760-9. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)90009-2.
6
Comparative effects of terfenadine and loratadine in the treatment of hay fever.特非那定与氯雷他定治疗花粉症的对比效果
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 1991 Dec;1(6):368-72.
7
Comparison of intranasal triamcinolone acetonide with oral loratadine in the treatment of seasonal ragweed-induced allergic rhinitis.鼻内用曲安奈德与口服氯雷他定治疗季节性豚草诱发的变应性鼻炎的比较。
Am J Manag Care. 1997 Jul;3(7):1052-8.
8
A comparison of the efficacy of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray and loratadine, alone and in combination, for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.丙酸氟替卡松水性鼻喷雾剂与氯雷他定单独及联合使用治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效比较。
J Fam Pract. 1998 Aug;47(2):118-25.
9
Therapeutic efficacy and safety of loratadine syrup in childhood atopic dermatitis treated with mometasone furoate 0.1 per cent cream.氯雷他定糖浆在联合0.1%糠酸莫米松乳膏治疗儿童特应性皮炎中的疗效及安全性。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2002 Apr;85(4):482-7.
10
Once-daily ofloxacin otic solution versus neomycin sulfate/polymyxin B sulfate/hydrocortisone otic suspension four times a day: a multicenter, randomized, evaluator-blinded trial to compare the efficacy, safety, and pain relief in pediatric patients with otitis externa.每日一次的氧氟沙星耳用溶液与每日四次的硫酸新霉素/硫酸多粘菌素B/氢化可的松耳用混悬液对比:一项多中心、随机、评估者盲法试验,比较小儿外耳道炎患者的疗效、安全性及疼痛缓解情况。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Sep;22(9):1725-36. doi: 10.1185/030079906X121057.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral H1 antihistamines as 'add-on' therapy to topical treatment for eczema.口服H1抗组胺药作为湿疹局部治疗的“附加”疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 22;1(1):CD012167. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012167.pub2.
2
Safety of antihistamines in children.抗组胺药在儿童中的安全性。
Drug Saf. 2001;24(2):119-47. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200124020-00003.
3
Loratadine. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in allergic disorders.氯雷他定:对其药理特性及在过敏性疾病治疗应用的重新评估
Drugs. 1994 Oct;48(4):617-37. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199448040-00009.