Sivin I, Stern J
Center for Biomedical Research, Population Council, New York, New York 10021.
Fertil Steril. 1994 Jan;61(1):70-7. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56455-3.
To measure and compare the incidence of adverse events during use of two medicated intrauterine devices (IUDs).
A multicenter prospective 7-year randomized study.
Family planning clinics, primarily in developing countries.
Women age 18 to 38 years at admission, desiring contraception and without contraindications to IUDs.
Incidence of complaints, conditions, and rates of specific termination for each IUD.
Subjects recorded menstrual events, and clinical staff registered all complaints and conditions found on examination at four first-year clinic visits and at semiannual visits thereafter. Difference in rates were analyzed by chi 2 statistics.
Annual pregnancy rates for each IUD averaged 0.2/100 women whereas upper genital tract infection occurred at rates of 0.6 to 0.7 per 100 years of use. The levonorgestrel-releasing IUD significantly decreased bleeding and spotting days in comparison with historical data for noncontraceptors and with the copper-medicated IUD. Dysmenorrhea, vaginitis, and myoma in women with the levonorgestrel IUD were markedly decreased in comparison with the experience of copper IUD users. Significantly higher rates of amenorrhea, delayed ovarian follicular atresia, skin and hair conditions, and headache were observed with the steroid IUD than with the copper-releasing IUD. Rates of reported adverse effects for either IUD were highest in the first 2 years of use and among women under age 25.
Long-term use of copper or levonorgestrel IUDs is characterized by very low rates of pregnancy and by a low and declining annual incidence of side effects, including pelvic infection and borderline anemia. The levonorgestrel-releasing IUD reduced the incidence of bleeding and, in the long term, of myoma and myoma-related surgery in comparison with the copper T IUD. Both IUDs proved highly acceptable and had few unanticipated side effects.
测量并比较两种含药宫内节育器(IUD)使用期间不良事件的发生率。
一项多中心前瞻性7年随机研究。
主要位于发展中国家的计划生育诊所。
入院时年龄在18至38岁之间、希望避孕且无IUD使用禁忌证的女性。
每种IUD的投诉发生率、疾病情况及特定终止率。
研究对象记录月经情况,临床工作人员在第一年的4次诊所就诊以及此后的半年一次就诊时登记所有检查中发现的投诉和疾病情况。率的差异采用卡方统计分析。
每种IUD的年妊娠率平均为0.2/100名女性,而上生殖道感染的发生率为每使用100年0.6至0.7例。与非避孕者的历史数据以及含铜IUD相比,左炔诺孕酮释放IUD显著减少了出血和点滴出血天数。与使用铜IUD的女性相比,使用左炔诺孕酮IUD的女性痛经、阴道炎和肌瘤明显减少。与含铜IUD相比,使用甾体IUD的女性闭经、卵巢卵泡闭锁延迟、皮肤和毛发疾病以及头痛的发生率显著更高。两种IUD报告的不良反应发生率在使用的前2年以及25岁以下女性中最高。
长期使用铜或左炔诺孕酮IUD的特点是妊娠率极低,包括盆腔感染和边缘性贫血在内的副作用年发生率低且呈下降趋势。与铜T型IUD相比,左炔诺孕酮释放IUD降低了出血发生率,从长期来看,也降低了肌瘤及肌瘤相关手术的发生率。两种IUD都被证明具有高度可接受性,且意外副作用很少。