• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术和开放性阑尾切除术的随机对照试验。

Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy.

作者信息

Kum C K, Ngoi S S, Goh P M, Tekant Y, Isaac J R

机构信息

Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1993 Dec;80(12):1599-600. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800801236.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.1800801236
PMID:8298936
Abstract

A study was carried out of 137 patients with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis who were randomized to either laparoscopic or open appendicectomy. Patients found to have perforated or normal appendices at histological examination were excluded. Fifty-two patients undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy and those receiving 57 open procedures were analysed. Laparoscopic appendicectomy took no longer than the open procedure (mean 43 versus 40 min). The number of doses of pethidine (1 mg per kg body-weight) required in the immediate postoperative period did not differ between the two groups but the mean number of doses of oral analgesic (naproxen sodium 550 mg twice daily) required was less in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy (2.8 versus 5.0, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between time to resumption of fluid and diet intake and length of hospital stay. There were five (9 per cent) wound infections after open appendicectomy compared with none after the laparoscopic operation (P < 0.01). Patients who underwent laparoscopy returned to full home (17 versus 30 days, P < 0.01) and social (19 versus 32 days, P < 0.05) activities earlier than those who underwent open operation. Laparoscopic appendicectomy may allow reduction in the number of wound infections and earlier return to normal activities.

摘要

对137例诊断为急性阑尾炎的患者进行了一项研究,这些患者被随机分为接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术或开腹阑尾切除术。组织学检查发现阑尾穿孔或正常的患者被排除。对52例行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的患者和57例行开腹手术的患者进行了分析。腹腔镜阑尾切除术所用时间不超过开腹手术(平均43分钟对40分钟)。术后即刻所需哌替啶(每千克体重1毫克)的剂量在两组之间无差异,但腹腔镜阑尾切除术患者所需口服镇痛药(萘普生钠550毫克,每日两次)的平均剂量较少(2.8对5.0,P<0.05)。恢复液体和饮食摄入时间及住院时间无显著差异。开腹阑尾切除术后有5例(9%)伤口感染,而腹腔镜手术后无伤口感染(P<0.01)。接受腹腔镜检查的患者比接受开腹手术的患者更早恢复完全的家庭活动(17天对30天,P<0.01)和社交活动(19天对32天,P<0.05)。腹腔镜阑尾切除术可能会减少伤口感染数量并更早恢复正常活动。

相似文献

1
Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy.比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术和开放性阑尾切除术的随机对照试验。
Br J Surg. 1993 Dec;80(12):1599-600. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800801236.
2
Single-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children.儿童腹腔镜与开放阑尾切除术的单盲随机临床试验
Br J Surg. 2001 Apr;88(4):510-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01723.x.
3
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的随机临床试验
Br J Surg. 2001 Feb;88(2):200-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01652.x.
4
Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: a prospective evaluation.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:一项前瞻性评估。
Br J Surg. 1992 Aug;79(8):818-20. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800790837.
5
Short-term complications and long-term morbidity of laparoscopic and open appendicectomy in a national cohort.腹腔镜和开腹阑尾切除术在全国队列中的短期并发症和长期发病率。
Br J Surg. 2014 Aug;101(9):1135-42. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9552. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
6
Conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis.传统手术与腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的比较
Br J Surg. 1993 Jun;80(6):761-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800636.
7
Laparoscopy or not: a meta-analysis of the surgical effects of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.是否采用腹腔镜手术:腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术手术效果的荟萃分析
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010 Dec;20(6):362-70. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182006f40.
8
Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的前瞻性随机多中心研究
Br J Surg. 1999 Jan;86(1):48-53. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.00971.x.
9
Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: a prospective assessment.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:一项前瞻性评估。
Br J Surg. 1994 Jan;81(1):133-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810148.
10
Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis: a prospective study.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗疑似阑尾炎的前瞻性研究
Aust N Z J Surg. 1994 Dec;64(12):830-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1994.tb04558.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗疑似阑尾炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 28;11(11):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4.
2
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for complicated appendicitis: a randomized controlled trial to prove safety.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗复杂性阑尾炎:一项旨在证明安全性的随机对照试验
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jul;29(7):2027-32. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3906-y. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
3
Laparoscopy for the management of acute lower abdominal pain in women of childbearing age.
腹腔镜检查用于育龄期女性急性下腹痛的管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 22;2014(5):CD007683. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007683.pub3.
4
Laparoscopic appendicectomy versus open appendicectomy: a comparative study of clinical outcome and cost analysis - Institutional experience.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术:临床结果与成本分析的比较研究——机构经验
Indian J Surg. 2009 Jun;71(3):142-6. doi: 10.1007/s12262-009-0038-z. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
5
Meta-analysis of the results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopic and open surgery for acute appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗急性阑尾炎的随机对照试验结果的荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Oct;16(10):1929-39. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1972-9. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
6
Laparoscopic management of appendicular mass.阑尾周围脓肿的腹腔镜治疗
J Minim Access Surg. 2011 Apr;7(2):136-40. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.78345.
7
Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: An Indian perspective.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:印度视角
J Minim Access Surg. 2005 Mar;1(1):15-20. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.15241.
8
Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜与传统阑尾切除术的比较——随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov 3;10:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-129.
9
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的Meta 分析。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Apr;25(4):1199-208. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1344-z. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
10
Early laparoscopy for the evaluation of nonspecific abdominal pain: a critical appraisal of the evidence.早期腹腔镜检查评估非特异性腹痛:证据的批判性评价。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jan;25(1):10-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1145-4. Epub 2010 Jun 30.