Wierzbicki M
Department of Psychology, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53201-1881, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 1997 Aug;53(5):421-6. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199708)53:5<421::aid-jclp2>3.0.co;2-q.
Subtle and obvious MCMI-II items were identified using ratings of item subtlety by 103 college students. Another group of 304 students completed the MCMI-II under instructions to answer honestly or to fake their appearance. An index of differential endorsement of subtle and obvious items (S-O) was significantly correlated with the Desirability and Debasement validity scales. S-O was about as successful as the three MCMI-II validity scales in discriminating between subjects who answer honestly and who fake their appearance. Although S-O is related to the MCMI-II validity scales, it appears to add to the ability of these scales to identify subjects who attempt to fake their profile.
通过103名大学生对项目微妙程度的评分，识别出了MCMI-II中微妙和明显的项目。另一组304名学生在被指示诚实地回答或伪装自己的情况下完成了MCMI-II。微妙和明显项目的差异认可指数（S-O）与期望和贬低效度量表显著相关。在区分诚实回答和伪装回答的受试者方面，S-O与MCMI-II的三个效度量表的效果相当。虽然S-O与MCMI-II效度量表相关，但它似乎增强了这些量表识别试图伪装个人资料的受试者的能力。
