Wong J L, Gilpin A R
Department of Psychology, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls 50614-0505.
J Clin Psychol. 1993 Nov;49(6):847-54. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199311)49:6<847::aid-jclp2270490612>3.0.co;2-a.
This study investigated whether the a priori classification of Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) subtests into separate Verbal and Visual categories is warranted. Correlational and hierarchical clustering analyses found that (a) memory test performance correlated significantly with performance on subtests of Form II of the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery (LNNB-II) that measure substrates of particular memory processes; and (b) subtests that appeared a priori to involve verbal skills clustered separately from those that appeared to involve nonverbal (visual) skills. However, the WMS-R Visual Paired Associates subtest did not cluster with the nonverbal scales as expected, and the LNNB-II Memory Scale appeared to be predominantly a test of verbal memory. Practical consequences of these findings were discussed.
本研究调查了将韦氏记忆量表修订版(WMS-R)子测验预先分类为单独的言语和视觉类别是否合理。相关性分析和层次聚类分析发现:(a)记忆测试表现与鲁利亚-内布拉斯加神经心理成套测验第二版(LNNB-II)中测量特定记忆过程基质的子测验表现显著相关;(b) 先验看来涉及言语技能的子测验与那些似乎涉及非言语(视觉)技能的子测验分开聚类。然而,WMS-R视觉配对联想子测验并未如预期那样与非言语量表聚类,并且LNNB-II记忆量表似乎主要是一项言语记忆测试。讨论了这些发现的实际影响。