Suppr超能文献

用于检测深度运动的双眼机制。

Binocular mechanisms for detecting motion-in-depth.

作者信息

Cumming B G, Parker A J

机构信息

University Laboratory of Physiology, Oxford, England.

出版信息

Vision Res. 1994 Feb;34(4):483-95. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90162-7.

Abstract

There are in principle at least two binocular sources of information that could be used to determine the motion of an object towards or away from an observer: such motion produces changes in binocular disparities over time and also generates different image velocities in the two eyes. Existing psychophysical and physiological evidence is reviewed. It is concluded that these data are inconclusive concerning whether one or both of these sources of information are used in primate vision. Thresholds were measured for disparity modulations in dynamic (temporally uncorrelated) random dot stereograms (RDS), and for RDS in which the same random dot pattern was used throughout (temporally correlated). Although the first stimulus contains no consistent inter-ocular velocity differences, thresholds were generally slightly lower for this stimulus than for temporally correlated stimuli. Sensitivity to the temporal derivative of disparity is therefore adequate to account for human stereomotion detection. A stimulus was devised in which monocular motion was clearly visible to each eye (with opposite velocities) but in which all disparity changes were beyond the temporal resolution of stereopsis. This produced no sensation of motion-in-depth. Similarly, stimuli beyond the spatial resolution of stereopsis did not support stereomotion detection. These data strongly suggest that stereomotion is primarily detected by means of temporal changes in binocular disparity. We argue that there is no experimental evidence that supports the existence of a mechanism sensitive to inter-ocular velocity differences.

摘要

原则上至少有两种双目信息源可用于确定物体朝向或远离观察者的运动

这种运动会随时间产生双目视差变化,并且还会在两只眼睛中产生不同的图像速度。本文回顾了现有的心理物理学和生理学证据。得出的结论是,关于灵长类动物视觉中是否使用了这些信息源中的一种或两种,这些数据尚无定论。测量了动态(时间上不相关)随机点立体图(RDS)中视差调制的阈值,以及在整个过程中使用相同随机点图案的RDS(时间上相关)的阈值。尽管第一种刺激不包含一致的眼间速度差异,但该刺激的阈值通常比时间相关刺激的阈值略低。因此,对视差时间导数的敏感度足以解释人类的立体运动检测。设计了一种刺激,其中单眼运动对每只眼睛都清晰可见(速度相反),但所有视差变化都超出了立体视觉的时间分辨率。这没有产生深度运动的感觉。同样,超出立体视觉空间分辨率的刺激也不支持立体运动检测。这些数据强烈表明,立体运动主要是通过双目视差的时间变化来检测的。我们认为,没有实验证据支持存在对眼间速度差异敏感的机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验