Docherty N M, Evans I M, Sledge W H, Seibyl J P, Krystal J H
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06519.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1994 Feb;182(2):98-102. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199402000-00006.
Thirty acutely schizophrenic inpatients each provided two speech samples: one on affectively negative, "high-stress" topics and one on affectively positive, "low-stress" topics. We analyzed these using two different, established methods for assessment of deviance in natural language, including clinical measures of thought disorder and linguistic measures of reference performance. For the group as a whole, the speech on negative topics contained more disorder than did the speech on positive topics, as rated both clinically and linguistically, and these differences were sizeable and highly significant. Level of language disturbance and degree of affective reactivity of language symptoms correlated positively with severity of the positive syndrome but were not associated in either direction with negative syndrome severity. Affective reactivity of symptoms is discussed as a variable potentially relevant to studies of psychophysiology and subtyping in schizophrenia.
30名急性精神分裂症住院患者每人提供了两份言语样本:一份是关于情感消极的“高压力”主题,另一份是关于情感积极的“低压力”主题。我们使用两种不同的、既定的自然语言偏差评估方法对这些样本进行了分析,包括思维障碍的临床测量和参照表现的语言测量。从整体来看,无论是从临床还是语言角度评定,消极主题的言语比积极主题的言语包含更多紊乱,而且这些差异相当大且高度显著。语言紊乱程度和语言症状的情感反应程度与阳性综合征的严重程度呈正相关,但与阴性综合征的严重程度在任何一个方向上均无关联。症状的情感反应作为一个可能与精神分裂症心理生理学研究和亚型划分相关的变量进行了讨论。