Sjöberg M, Nitescu P, Appelgren L, Curelaru I
Division of Anesthesiology, Sahlgrenska Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Anesthesiology. 1994 Feb;80(2):284-97. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199402000-00008.
There are no clinical data regarding the ratios and concentrations in which morphine and bupivacaine should be combined, when given intrathecally, to improve analgesia while decreasing adverse effects. This study was undertaken to test the clinical efficacy of a constant infusion of 0.5 mg/ml morphine plus 4.75 mg/ml bupivacaine (morphine: bupivacaine approximately 1:10), given through open intrathecal catheters.
In 53 patients, the clinical efficacy was estimated from: pain relief (visual analog scale scores 0-10); daily dosages (intrathecal and total opioid and intrathecal bupivacaine); scores (0-5) of nonopioid analgesic and sedative consumption, gait and daily activity, and amount of sleep; and rates of adverse effects.
During the intrathecal period (7-334, median 29 days), all 53 patients obtained acceptable pain relief (visual analog scale scores 0-2 vs. 6-10 in the pre-intrathecal stage). The total opioid daily consumption decreased (median 10 vs. 120 mg), the sleep was about two times longer, the nonopioid analgesic and sedative consumption about two times lower, and the gait ability pattern was unchanged. The daily dose of intrathecal morphine (median 6 mg) and the daily intrathecal volumes (median 10 ml) were low, whereas the daily dose of intrathecal bupivacaine was relatively high (median 50 mg). Side effects potentially related to intrathecal morphine (seizures, cerebral, and spinal clonus) were not recorded. Side effects attributable to intrathecal bupivacaine (in patients not having these complications before the intrathecal treatment) occurred in the forms of late urinary retention (9 of 27), paresthesias (11 of 27), paresis/gait impairment (9 of 27), and occasional episodes of orthostatic arterial hypotension (1 of 53 patients).
A constant intrathecal infusion with a morphine:bupivacaine ratio of approximately 1:10 and concentrations of morphine of 0.5 mg/ml and bupivacaine of 4.75 mg/ml may significantly improve the relief of refractory cancer pain with a certain risk of adverse effects (which should be balanced against pain by the patient) from the relatively high intrathecal bupivacaine doses and concentration.
关于鞘内注射吗啡和布比卡因时,为改善镇痛效果同时减少不良反应,二者应采用的配比和浓度,尚无临床数据。本研究旨在测试通过开放鞘内导管持续输注0.5毫克/毫升吗啡加4.75毫克/毫升布比卡因(吗啡:布比卡因约为1:10)的临床疗效。
对53例患者,从以下方面评估临床疗效:疼痛缓解情况(视觉模拟评分0 - 10分);每日剂量(鞘内及总阿片类药物用量和鞘内布比卡因用量);非阿片类镇痛药和镇静药用量、步态及日常活动评分(0 - 5分)、睡眠时间;以及不良反应发生率。
在鞘内治疗期间(7 - 334天,中位数29天),所有53例患者的疼痛均得到可接受程度的缓解(视觉模拟评分从鞘内治疗前的6 - 10分降至0 - 2分)。每日总阿片类药物用量减少(中位数从120毫克降至10毫克),睡眠时间延长约两倍,非阿片类镇痛药和镇静药用量降低约两倍,步态能力模式未改变。鞘内吗啡每日剂量(中位数6毫克)和鞘内每日容积(中位数10毫升)较低,而鞘内布比卡因每日剂量相对较高(中位数50毫克)。未记录到与鞘内吗啡可能相关的副作用(癫痫发作、脑部和脊髓阵挛)。鞘内布比卡因所致的副作用(在鞘内治疗前无这些并发症的患者中)表现为迟发性尿潴留(27例中有9例)、感觉异常(27例中有11例)、轻瘫/步态障碍(27例中有9例),以及偶发的体位性动脉低血压(53例患者中有1例)。
以约1:10的吗啡:布比卡因比例及0.5毫克/毫升吗啡和4.75毫克/毫升布比卡因的浓度进行持续鞘内输注,可能显著改善难治性癌痛的缓解情况,但由于鞘内布比卡因剂量和浓度相对较高,存在一定的不良反应风险(患者应在疼痛与不良反应之间权衡)。