Lurie N, Christianson J, Finch M, Moscovice I
University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis.
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Mar 15;120(6):506-11. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-6-199403150-00010.
To determine the effect on health and functional status outcomes of enrollment of noninstitutionalized elderly Medicaid recipients in prepaid plans compared with traditional fee-for-service Medicaid.
A randomized controlled trial. Beneficiaries were randomly assigned to prepaid care in one of seven capitated health plans compared with fee-for-service care. Only the Medicaid portion of their care was capitated. Patients were followed for 1 year.
The Medicaid Demonstration Project in Hennepin County, Minnesota, which includes Minneapolis.
800 Medicaid beneficiaries who were 65 years or older at the beginning of the evaluation. Beneficiaries were interviewed at baseline (time 1) and 1 year later (time 2). Ninety-six percent of beneficiaries were available for follow-up interviews at time 2.
General health status, physical functioning, mental health status, activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, corrected visual acuity, and blood pressure and glycosylated hemoglobin measurements for hypertensive and diabetic persons, respectively.
There were no differences between prepaid and fee-for-service groups in the number of deaths (20 compared with 24, P > 0.2), the proportion in fair or poor health (56.5% compared with 59.7%, P > 0.2), physical functioning, activities of daily living, visual acuity, or blood pressure or diabetic control. Patients in the prepaid group reported a trend toward better general health rating scores (10.2 compared with 9.8, P = 0.06) and well-being scores (10.0 compared with 9.7, P = 0.07) than patients in the fee-for-service group. The difference in the likelihood of a patient in the prepaid group having a physician visit relative to the fee-for-service group was -16.5% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.74) and for an inpatient visit was -11.2% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; CI, 0.32 to 0.94).
There was no evidence of harmful effects of enrolling elderly Medicaid patients in prepaid plans, at least in the short run. Whether these findings also apply to settings in which health maintenance organizations are formed exclusively for Medicaid patients should be studied further.
确定与传统的按服务收费的医疗补助计划相比,将非机构化老年医疗补助受助人纳入预付计划对健康和功能状态结果的影响。
一项随机对照试验。将受益人随机分配到七个按人头付费的健康计划之一接受预付护理,与按服务收费的护理进行比较。仅其护理的医疗补助部分按人头付费。对患者进行了1年的随访。
明尼苏达州亨内平县(包括明尼阿波利斯)的医疗补助示范项目。
800名在评估开始时年龄在65岁及以上的医疗补助受益人。在基线(时间1)和1年后(时间2)对受益人进行了访谈。96%的受益人在时间2时可接受随访访谈。
一般健康状况、身体功能、心理健康状况、日常生活活动、工具性日常生活活动、矫正视力,以及高血压和糖尿病患者的血压和糖化血红蛋白测量值。
预付组和按服务收费组在死亡人数(分别为20例和24例,P>0.2)、健康状况一般或较差的比例(分别为56.5%和59.7%,P>0.2)、身体功能、日常生活活动、视力、血压或糖尿病控制方面没有差异。预付组患者报告的一般健康评分(分别为10.2和9.8,P=0.06)和幸福感评分(分别为10.0和9.7,P=0.07)有比按服务收费组患者更好的趋势。预付组患者相对于按服务收费组患者看医生的可能性差异为-16.5%(调整后的优势比,0.46;95%置信区间,0.29至 &emsp