MacLeod C, Cohen I L
Department of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Perth.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1993 May;102(2):238-47. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.102.2.238.
Beck's influential cognitive account of anxiety has led to the prediction that individuals vulnerable to anxiety should favor threatening interpretations of ambiguity (e.g., Beck & Clark, 1988; Beck, Emery, & Greenberg, 1986). The current study introduces a novel adaptation of the RSVP technique, previously used in text comprehension research, to evaluate this hypothesis. Results suggest that a group of 24 high trait anxious students did indeed selectively impose threatening interpretations on unconstrained ambiguous sentences. In contrast, a matched group of 24 low trait anxious students appeared to selectively impose non-threatening interpretations on such ambiguous sentences. These findings are fully consistent with the predicted anxiety-linked interpretative bias. Specific testable hypotheses are developed concerning the types of interpretative idiosyncrasies that plausibly may contribute to pathological anxiety.
易患焦虑症的个体应该倾向于对模棱两可的情况做出威胁性的解读(例如,贝克和克拉克,1988年;贝克、埃默里和格林伯格,1986年)。当前的研究引入了一种对快速序列视觉呈现(RSVP)技术的新颖改编,该技术先前用于文本理解研究,以评估这一假设。结果表明,一组24名高特质焦虑的学生确实对无约束的模棱两可句子选择性地施加了威胁性解读。相比之下,一组与之匹配的24名低特质焦虑的学生似乎对这类模棱两可句子选择性地施加了非威胁性解读。这些发现与预测的与焦虑相关的解释偏差完全一致。针对可能导致病理性焦虑的解释特质类型,提出了具体的可检验假设。