Dahl Jørgen B, Brennum Jannick, Arendt-Nielsen Lars, Jensen Troels S, Kehlet Henrik
Department of Anesthesiology, Hvidovre University Hospital, CopenhagenDenmark Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Hvidovre University Hospital, CopenhagenDenmark Department of Neurology, Gentofte University Hospital, HellerupDenmark Department of Medical Informatics, Aalborg University, AalborgDenmark Department of Neurology, Århus University Hospital, ÅrhusDenmark.
Pain. 1993 Apr;53(1):43-51. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90054-S.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of pre- and postinjury infiltration with lidocaine on alterations in mechanical and thermal sensitivity after heat injury to the skin. In the first part of the study, burn injuries (15 x 25 mm rectangular thermode, 50 degrees C, 7 min) were produced twice in each subject on the medial side of the left and right calves at least 24 h apart in 8 healthy, unmedicated male volunteers, in order to investigate the effects of the injury on sensitivity in untreated skin. In the second part of the study, burn injuries (15 x 25 mm rectangular thermode, 50 degrees C, 6 min) were produced twice in each subject on the medial side of the left and right calves at least 24 h apart (n = 10). This was preceded by subcutaneous (s.c.) infiltration with 5-6 ml of 1% plain lidocaine (pre-injury block) on one day, and the same block was performed 35 min after injury (postinjury block) on the other day. Warm detection thresholds (WDT) and heat pain detection thresholds (HPDT) were determined within and outside the injury before and at regular intervals after injury. Areas of hyperalgesia to pinprick and brush were determined at regular intervals after injury. In the first part of the study, it was observed that both WDT and HPDT were decreased within but not outside the injury, and areas of hyperalgesia to pinprick and brush were found in- and outside the injury in all subjects. These findings were relatively constant throughout the study period and reproducible between the 2 days of examination. In the second part of the study, it was observed that pre-injury infiltration with lidocaine reduced hyperalgesia to pinprick and brush outside the injury more effectively than postinjury block, but only for the first 70 min after injury, while no significant difference was observed 100-190 min after injury. Likewise, there was no difference in thermal thresholds inside the injury between pre- and postinjury treatment at the end of the study period. It is concluded, that a shortlasting 'preemptive' infiltration with lidocaine may postpone but not prevent the occurrence of hyperalgesia outside a thermal injury.
本研究的目的是评估利多卡因在热损伤前后对皮肤机械和热敏感性改变的影响。在研究的第一部分,在8名健康、未用药的男性志愿者的左右小腿内侧,每次至少间隔24小时进行两次烧伤(15×25毫米矩形热探头,50℃,7分钟),以研究损伤对未处理皮肤敏感性的影响。在研究的第二部分,在10名受试者的左右小腿内侧,每次至少间隔24小时进行两次烧伤(15×25毫米矩形热探头,50℃,6分钟)。在一天进行皮下注射5 - 6毫升1%的普通利多卡因(损伤前阻滞),在另一天损伤后35分钟进行相同的阻滞(损伤后阻滞)。在损伤前后及损伤后定期测定损伤部位内外的热觉检测阈值(WDT)和热痛检测阈值(HPDT)。在损伤后定期测定对针刺和刷擦的痛觉过敏区域。在研究的第一部分,观察到WDT和HPDT在损伤部位内降低,但在损伤部位外未降低,并且在所有受试者的损伤部位内外均发现了对针刺和刷擦的痛觉过敏区域。这些发现在整个研究期间相对稳定,并且在两天的检查之间具有可重复性。在研究的第二部分,观察到利多卡因损伤前浸润比损伤后阻滞更有效地减轻了损伤部位外对针刺和刷擦的痛觉过敏,但仅在损伤后的前70分钟有效,而在损伤后100 - 190分钟未观察到显著差异。同样,在研究期末,损伤部位内热阈值在损伤前和损伤后治疗之间没有差异。得出结论,利多卡因的短期“先发制人”浸润可能会推迟但不能预防热损伤部位外痛觉过敏的发生。