Marquette C H, Georges H, Wallet F, Ramon P, Saulnier F, Neviere R, Mathieu D, Rime A, Tonnel A B
Département de Pneumologie, Hôpital A. Calmette, Lille, France.
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Jul;148(1):138-44. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/148.1.138.
The objectives of the study were to determine the agreement between the protected specimen brush technique (PSB) with quantitative cultures and endotracheal aspirates (EA) with quantitative cultures when using increasing interpretative cutoff points and to investigate the respective operating characteristics for the diagnosis of pneumonia of PSB and EA when using quantitative cultures. Consecutive sampling of respiratory secretions using these two techniques was conducted in the respiratory intensive care units in 52 mechanically ventilated patients with clinical and radiologic suspicion of pneumonia. Quantitative bacterial cultures of PSB and EA samples were obtained. The 10(6) cfu/ml cutoff point was the most accurate diagnostic threshold for the EA technique. When using this threshold, there was a high level of agreement (84.6%) between PSB and EA results. Among the few discrepancies, the EA result was always indicative of pneumonia, whereas the PSB result was nonindicative, thus permitting us to classify correctly five patients in whom pneumonia would have been erroneously excluded on the basis of the sole result of PSB. Conversely, there was no case where the PSB result was indicative of pneumonia when the EA result (at the 10(6) cfu/ml level) was not. The operating characteristics of the PSB technique for the diagnosis of pneumonia were in accordance with previously published studies. The operating characteristics of the EA technique (when taking the 10(6) cfu/ml of respiratory secretions as the interpretative cutoff point) compared favorably with those of the PSB technique. Diagnostic accuracy rates were similar. The specificity of EA was somewhat lower (83 versus 96%), but the sensitivity was higher (82 versus 64%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究的目的是确定在使用不断增加的解释性临界值时,定量培养的保护性标本刷检技术(PSB)与定量培养的气管内吸出物(EA)之间的一致性,并研究使用定量培养时PSB和EA诊断肺炎的各自操作特征。在52例临床和影像学怀疑患有肺炎的机械通气患者的呼吸重症监护病房中,使用这两种技术对呼吸道分泌物进行连续采样。获得了PSB和EA样本的定量细菌培养结果。10⁶ cfu/ml的临界值是EA技术最准确的诊断阈值。使用该阈值时,PSB和EA结果之间具有高度一致性(84.6%)。在少数不一致的情况中,EA结果总是提示肺炎,而PSB结果则不提示,从而使我们能够正确分类五例仅根据PSB结果会被错误排除肺炎的患者。相反,当EA结果(在10⁶ cfu/ml水平)不提示肺炎时,没有出现PSB结果提示肺炎的情况。PSB技术诊断肺炎的操作特征与先前发表的研究一致。EA技术(以呼吸道分泌物10⁶ cfu/ml作为解释性临界值时)的操作特征与PSB技术相比更具优势。诊断准确率相似。EA的特异性略低(83%对96%),但敏感性更高(82%对64%)。(摘要截断于250字)