Suppr超能文献

就低血糖范围而言,家用血糖仪的准确性如何?

How accurate are home blood-glucose meters with special respect to the low glycemic range?

作者信息

Moberg E, Lundblad S, Lins P E, Adamson U

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1993 Mar;19(3):239-43. doi: 10.1016/0168-8227(93)90119-p.

Abstract

Comparisons were made between four blood-glucose meters (Diascan, Glucometer II, Reflolux II and ExacTech) and a reference method (YSI) for the full, clinical, blood-glucose range and for the subranges < 4.4 mmol/l, 4.4-10.0 mmol/l and > 10.0 mmol/l, respectively. In the low-glucose range, the error-grid analysis was also applied. All the meters showed acceptable agreement with the reference method when the whole glucose range was considered, yielding r-values between 0.96 and 0.99. However, when the results were separated in the different subranges, the outcome was different, in that the Diascan meter displayed systematically high glucose levels and the ExacTech meter showed a great spread of the values within the low-glucose range, whereas the Glucometer II and the Reflolux II meter were less accurate within the high-glucose range. By applying the error-grid analysis, several errors of clinical importance within the low glycemic range were revealed, while other significant errors, which might lead to inadequate therapeutic decisions, were classified as 'clinically accurate'.

摘要

对四种血糖仪(Diascan、血糖仪II、Reflolux II和ExacTech)与一种参考方法(YSI)进行了比较,分别针对整个临床血糖范围以及<4.4 mmol/L、4.4 - 10.0 mmol/L和>10.0 mmol/L的子范围。在低血糖范围内,还应用了误差网格分析。当考虑整个血糖范围时,所有血糖仪与参考方法均显示出可接受的一致性,r值在0.96至0.99之间。然而,当结果按不同子范围分开时,结果有所不同,即Diascan血糖仪系统性地显示出高血糖水平,ExacTech血糖仪在低血糖范围内的值分布差异很大,而血糖仪II和Reflolux II血糖仪在高血糖范围内准确性较低。通过应用误差网格分析,在低血糖范围内发现了一些具有临床重要性的误差,而其他可能导致治疗决策不当的重大误差则被归类为“临床准确”。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验