• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情感与年龄:结构和患病率的横断面比较

Affect and age: cross-sectional comparisons of Structure and prevalence.

作者信息

Lawton M P, Kleban M H, Dean J

机构信息

Polisher Research Institute, Philadelphia Geriatric Center, Pennsylvania 19141.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 1993 Jun;8(2):165-75. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.8.2.165.

DOI:10.1037//0882-7974.8.2.165
PMID:8323721
Abstract

The self-reports of 207 young-adult (ages 18-30), 231 middle-aged (ages 31-59), and 828 older-adult (age 60 and over) Ss were used to study the structure of affect. Affects were represented by terms included in various circumplex arrays of emotions as presented by previous investigators. A set of 46 affects was subjected to exploratory analysis, and a final set of 38 affects was subjected to confirmatory factor analysis. The goodness of fit of each group's factor loadings to the hypothesized factors of positive affect, depression, anxiety-guilt, contentment, hostility, and shyness was not up to the desired .90 level, and some significant differences in factor structure were observed for each age-group comparison. There were few age differences in levels of positive affect. Depression was most frequent among younger Ss and least frequent among older Ss. Younger Ss were most often anxious and shy. Older Ss were most often content and least often hostile.

摘要

207名青年(18 - 30岁)、231名中年(31 - 59岁)和828名老年(60岁及以上)受试者的自我报告被用于研究情感结构。情感由先前研究者提出的各种环形情感阵列中包含的术语表示。一组46种情感进行了探索性分析,最终一组38种情感进行了验证性因素分析。每组的因素负荷与积极情感、抑郁、焦虑 - 内疚、满足、敌意和害羞等假设因素的拟合优度未达到理想的0.90水平,并且在每个年龄组比较中观察到了因素结构的一些显著差异。积极情感水平上几乎没有年龄差异。抑郁在年轻受试者中最常见,在老年受试者中最不常见。年轻受试者最常焦虑和害羞。老年受试者最常满足,最不常怀有敌意。

相似文献

1
Affect and age: cross-sectional comparisons of Structure and prevalence.情感与年龄:结构和患病率的横断面比较
Psychol Aging. 1993 Jun;8(2):165-75. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.8.2.165.
2
Age-group differences in facets of positive and negative affect.各年龄段积极和消极情感的各个方面的差异。
Aging Ment Health. 2011 Aug;15(6):784-95. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.562184. Epub 2011 May 24.
3
Confirmatory factor analysis of the General Self-Efficacy Scale.一般自我效能感量表的验证性因素分析
Behav Res Ther. 1998 Mar;36(3):339-43. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00025-4.
4
Factorial structure and age-related psychometrics of the MIDUS personality adjective items across the life span.人格形容词项目 MIDUS 跨生命周期的因子结构和与年龄相关的心理计量学。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Mar;24(1):173-86. doi: 10.1037/a0025265. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
5
Irritable-hostile depression: further validation as a bipolar depressive mixed state.易激惹-敌意性抑郁:作为双相抑郁混合状态的进一步验证
J Affect Disord. 2005 Feb;84(2-3):197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2004.07.006.
6
The factorial generality of brief positive and negative affect measures.简短积极和消极情绪测量的析因普遍性。
J Gerontol. 1992 Jul;47(4):P228-37. doi: 10.1093/geronj/47.4.p228.
7
Confirmatory factor analysis of The Aggression Questionnaire.《攻击问卷》的验证性因素分析。
Behav Res Ther. 1995 Nov;33(8):991-3. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(95)00038-y.
8
Assessing shyness in Chinese older adults.评估中国老年人的羞怯程度。
Aging Ment Health. 2005 Sep;9(5):456-60. doi: 10.1080/13607860500142820.
9
A test of the tripartite model of depression and anxiety in older adult psychiatric outpatients.老年精神科门诊患者抑郁与焦虑三联模型的一项测试。
Psychol Aging. 2004 Sep;19(3):444-51. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.19.3.444.
10
Biased recollections in older adults: the role of implicit theories of aging.老年人的偏差回忆:衰老内隐理论的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 May;62(5):837-50. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.62.5.837.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a nomogram for predicting depression risk in patients with chronic kidney disease: an analysis of data from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2014.用于预测慢性肾脏病患者抑郁风险的列线图的开发:对2007 - 2014年美国国家健康与营养检查调查数据的分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 18;15(2):e089956. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089956.
2
Moderating role of age in the relationship between ingroup range and intention to help during the COVID-19 pandemic.年龄在新冠疫情期间内群体范围与帮助意愿关系中的调节作用。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0316316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316316. eCollection 2025.
3
Emotion, Aging, and Decision Making: A State of the Art Mini-Review.
情绪、衰老与决策:一篇前沿综述。
Adv Geriatr Med Res. 2023;5(1). doi: 10.20900/agmr20230003. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
4
Fear of contagion, emotional stress and coping strategies used by adults during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria.尼日利亚 COVID-19 大流行第一波期间成年人的传染病恐惧、情绪压力和应对策略。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 24;22(1):732. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04360-w.
5
Keeping Employees Safe During Health Crises: The Effects of Media Exposure, HR Practices, and Age.在健康危机期间保障员工安全:媒体曝光、人力资源实践和年龄的影响。
J Bus Psychol. 2023;38(2):457-472. doi: 10.1007/s10869-022-09837-9. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
6
Prevalence of anxiety symptoms among COVID-19 patients during the acute versus post symptomatic window.新冠病毒疾病患者在急性期与症状消退期的焦虑症状患病率。
J Psychosom Res. 2021 Jun;145:110432. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110432. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
7
The Appraisal Approach to Aging and Emotion: An Integrative Theoretical Framework.衰老与情绪的评估方法:一个综合理论框架。
Dev Rev. 2021 Mar;59. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2021.100947. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
8
The moderating role of age in the relationship between different stressors and the quality of life of the relatives of people with intellectual disabilities.年龄在不同压力源与智力残疾人亲属生活质量关系中的调节作用。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Nov;28(11):2969-2978. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02239-0. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
9
Dimensions of Anxiety, Age, and Gender: Assessing Dimensionality and Measurement Invariance of the State-Trait for Cognitive and Somatic Anxiety (STICSA) in an Italian Sample.焦虑、年龄和性别的维度:评估意大利样本中认知与躯体焦虑状态-特质量表(STICSA)的维度性和测量不变性
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 27;9:2345. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02345. eCollection 2018.
10
Prioritizing positivity across the adult lifespan: initial evidence for differential associations with positive and negative emotions.优先考虑成年期的积极情绪:积极和消极情绪关联的初步证据。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Feb;28(2):411-420. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2012-3. Epub 2018 Sep 25.