Suppr超能文献

Comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.

作者信息

Moseley M J, Thompson J R, Deutsch J, Misson G P, Naylor G, Tan-Yee A, Taylor R H, Fielder A R

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 1993;7 ( Pt 1):127-30. doi: 10.1038/eye.1993.26.

Abstract

The Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer (Keeler Ltd, UK) is compared with the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Data from 80 eyes were acquired by four experienced observers. A linear regression analysis showed the relationship between the instruments to be: Pulsair = 0.66 + 0.95 Goldmann. Individual components of variation were analysed by analysis of variance which indicated a significant variation in the slope of the regression equation due to observers (p = 0.02) but not to the order in which topical anaesthesia was administered. Differences between two Pulsair instruments were of marginal significance (p = 0.07). The intercept of the regression equation was unaffected by any of the components of variation. Seventy-nine per cent of averaged intraocular pressure measurements obtained with the Pulsair 2000 fell on or within +/- 3 mmHg of those measured with the Goldmann tonometer. It is concluded that the Pulsair 2000 can provide clinically useful measurements of intraocular pressure.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验