Thompson E P, Chaiken S, Hazlewood J D
Department of Psychology, New York University, New York 10003.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Jun;64(6):987-99. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.64.6.987.
Seventy-four Ss in extrinsic-reward or no-reward conditions completed a brainstorming task and then were left alone with the option to engage in additional versions of this task. If the Need for Cognition (NFC) Scale taps intrinsic motivation for effortful cognition (J. T. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty, 1982), the optional task engagement of high-NFCSs, but not low-NFCSs, should be undermined by extrinsic reward. Results confirmed this hypothesis, but regression analyses showed that NFC scores' moderation of reward effects was due to their covariation with scores on J. M. Burger and H. M. Cooper's (1979) Desire for Control Scale. The data suggest that (a) NFC involves intrinsic motivation for effortful cognitive processing, (b) NFC may predict such processing mainly in contexts with minimal extrinsic incentives for processing, and (c) control motivation may be related causally both to extrinsic undermining effects and to individual differences in NFC.
74名处于外部奖励或无奖励条件下的被试完成了一项头脑风暴任务,然后被单独留下,可选择参与该任务的其他版本。如果认知需求(NFC)量表能够衡量对努力认知的内在动机(J. T. 卡乔波和R. E. 佩蒂,1982),那么外部奖励应该会削弱高NFC被试而非低NFC被试参与可选任务的积极性。结果证实了这一假设,但回归分析表明,NFC分数对奖励效应的调节作用是由于它们与J. M. 伯格和H. M. 库珀(1979)的控制欲望量表分数存在共变关系。数据表明:(a)NFC涉及对努力认知加工的内在动机;(b)NFC可能主要在对加工的外部激励最小的情境中预测这种加工;(c)控制动机可能在因果关系上既与外部削弱效应有关,也与NFC的个体差异有关。