Suppr超能文献

短跑和中距离游泳运动员进行手臂曲柄运动时的无氧和有氧成分。

Anaerobic and aerobic components during arm-crank exercise in sprint and middle-distance swimmers.

作者信息

Mercier B, Granier P, Mercier J, Trouquet J, Préfaut C

机构信息

Service d'Exploration de la Fonction Respiratoire, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1993;66(5):461-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00599622.

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to compare anaerobic and aerobic components measured during arm exercise in sprint and middle-distance swimmers and to investigate whether the peak anaerobic power:peak aerobic power ratio (W(an),peak:Waer,peak) was related to specialization for the event and to performance. The W(an0,peak, force at zero velocity (F0), and velocity at zero-force (v0), Waer,peak, peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), and ventilatory threshold (Thv) were compared during arm exercise tests in sprint (group I, n = 8) and middle-distance (group II, n = 9) competitive male swimmers. Anaerobic indices were estimated by the force-velocity test, an anaerobic test using incremental braking forces; aerobic indices were measured during an incremental aerobic exercise test (30 W.min-1). The W(an),peak and Waer,peak were greater in group I [828 (SEM 70) W; 236 (SEM 12) W] than in group II [678 (SEM 28) W; 230 (SEM 5) W], but the differences were not significant. There were also no significant differences observed between the mean values of F0, v0, VO2peak, and Thv. The W(an0,peak:Waer,peak, however, was significantly higher in sprint swimmers (t = 3.08, P < 0.01). In seven of the swimmers, who had recently performed both the 100-m and 400-m front crawl, a relationship existed between their swim time and the W(an),peak:Waer,peak (100 m: r = -0.80, P < 0.05 and 400 m: r = +0.75, P < 0.05). In conclusion, during arm-crank exercise, we did not observe significant differences in anaerobic and aerobic components between sprint and middle-distance swimmers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

本研究的目的是比较短跑和中距离游泳运动员手臂运动时所测得的无氧和有氧成分,并探究无氧功率峰值与有氧功率峰值之比(W(an),peak:Waer,peak)是否与项目专项化及运动成绩相关。在短跑(第一组,n = 8)和中距离(第二组,n = 9)男性竞技游泳运动员的手臂运动测试中,对W(an),peak、零速度时的力(F0)、零力时的速度(v0)、Waer,peak、峰值摄氧量(VO2peak)和通气阈(Thv)进行了比较。无氧指标通过力 - 速度测试估算,这是一种使用递增制动力的无氧测试;有氧指标在递增有氧运动测试(30 W·min-1)期间进行测量。第一组的W(an),peak和Waer,peak[828(标准误70)W;236(标准误12)W]高于第二组[678(标准误28)W;230(标准误5)W],但差异不显著。F0、v0、VO2peak和Thv的平均值之间也未观察到显著差异。然而,短跑运动员的W(an),peak:Waer,peak显著更高(t = 3.08,P < 0.01)。在最近同时进行过100米和400米自由泳的7名游泳运动员中,他们的游泳成绩与W(an),peak:Waer,peak之间存在相关性(100米:r = -0.80,P < 0.05;400米:r = +0.75,P < 0.05)。总之,在手臂曲柄运动期间,我们未观察到短跑和中距离游泳运动员在无氧和有氧成分上的显著差异。(摘要截选至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验