Delfino R J, Becklake M R, Hanley J A
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Arch Environ Health. 1993 May-Jun;48(3):140-6. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1993.9940812.
The use of hospital databases for research into the respiratory effects of air pollution has been questioned. In an attempt to address that issue, reabstracts of 1,279 discharge records from 14 Montreal hospitals were compared with the universal health insurance database of Quebec. Agreement levels on discharge diagnoses were 94.9% for asthma; 75.5% for all other respiratory diagnoses combined, including upper airway infections, pneumonia, and coronary obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (90% after ignoring disagreements between closely related respiratory diagnoses); and 93.1% for a nonrespiratory comparison group. Factors associated with misclassification included use of nonurgent admissions; delays in hospital admission from emergency rooms; and differences in levels of diagnostic agreement between hospitals, age groups, and outcome groups. These should be taken into account in air pollution epidemiologic research in which databases of the kind commonly maintained in North American health care systems are used.
利用医院数据库研究空气污染对呼吸系统的影响受到了质疑。为解决这一问题,研究人员将蒙特利尔14家医院的1279份出院记录重新摘要与魁北克省的全民健康保险数据库进行了比较。哮喘出院诊断的一致率为94.9%;包括上呼吸道感染、肺炎和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)在内的所有其他呼吸系统诊断的综合一致率为75.5%(忽略密切相关呼吸系统诊断之间的分歧后为90%);非呼吸系统比较组的一致率为93.1%。与错误分类相关的因素包括使用非紧急入院;急诊室入院延迟;以及医院、年龄组和结果组之间诊断一致水平的差异。在使用北美医疗系统中常见的此类数据库进行空气污染流行病学研究时,应考虑这些因素。