Metz M E, Dwyer S M
Department of Family Practice & Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis 55454.
J Sex Marital Ther. 1993 Summer;19(2):104-22. doi: 10.1080/00926239308404894.
A substantial amount of research has distinguished specific behaviors of distressed from nondistressed couples. Among this evidence are differences in relationship conflict management styles. This investigation examined differences in relationship satisfaction and conflict management styles among 30 sex dysfunction, 25 sex offender, and 26 satisfied couples assessed by the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) and the Styles of Conflict Inventory (SCI). Results indicate significantly different levels of marital adjustment and distinctive conflict management patterns among the three couples groups. The two sex problem groups were significantly more distressed than the satisfied couples, and sex offender couples appeared more conflicted than sex dysfunction couples. Compared to satisfied couples, sex dysfunction couples address relationship conflict with somewhat polarized roles with an "avoid vs. engage" pattern, while sex offender couples employ a more chaotic "engage-avoid vs. engage-avoid" style. These different patterns of reactivity to conflict suggest that individualized treatment approaches to this dimension of the clinical picture is warranted.
大量研究已经区分了困扰夫妻与非困扰夫妻的特定行为。其中有证据表明关系冲突管理方式存在差异。本调查通过二元调整量表(DAS)和冲突方式量表(SCI),研究了30对性功能障碍夫妻、25对性犯罪者夫妻和26对关系满意的夫妻在关系满意度和冲突管理方式上的差异。结果表明,这三组夫妻在婚姻调适水平和独特的冲突管理模式上存在显著差异。两个存在性问题的组比关系满意的夫妻明显更困扰,性犯罪者夫妻似乎比性功能障碍夫妻冲突更多。与关系满意的夫妻相比,性功能障碍夫妻以“回避与参与”模式处理关系冲突,角色有些两极分化,而性犯罪者夫妻采用更混乱的“参与-回避与参与-回避”方式。这些对冲突的不同反应模式表明,针对临床情况的这一方面采取个性化治疗方法是有必要的。