• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与研究的权利。

The right to participate in research studies.

作者信息

Elks M L

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock 79430.

出版信息

J Lab Clin Med. 1993 Aug;122(2):130-6.

PMID:8340698
Abstract

Institutional review boards for the use of human subjects in scientific studies were initially established to focus on protection of human subjects from the risks of research. It has become evident in recent years, however, that it is also important to protect the rights of individuals to have access to the benefits of research participation. These include, but are not limited to, certain experimental drugs or treatments, closer monitoring, free care or direct remuneration, and societal benefits of results of studies on specific populations. Researchers, so long sensitized by their respective institutional review boards to the need for protection of the subjects, now must also focus on the added burden of efforts to include individuals and the increased efforts it may take to protect the safety and rights of certain populations, including patients with AIDS, women, minorities, children, and the elderly. Additional care must be taken to design appropriate studies, recruit an appropriate spectrum of the population, craft a complete yet understandable and nondeterent informed consent form, and make efforts to assure that participants are informed.

摘要

科学研究中使用人类受试者的机构审查委员会最初设立的目的是专注于保护人类受试者免受研究风险。然而,近年来已经很明显,保护个人获得参与研究益处的权利也很重要。这些益处包括但不限于某些实验药物或治疗、更密切的监测、免费护理或直接报酬,以及针对特定人群的研究结果所带来的社会益处。研究人员长期以来已被各自的机构审查委员会提醒要保护受试者,但现在他们还必须关注纳入个体所带来的额外负担,以及为保护某些人群(包括艾滋病患者、妇女、少数群体、儿童和老年人)的安全和权利可能需要付出的更多努力。必须格外小心地设计合适的研究、招募合适范围的人群、精心制定一份完整但易懂且不具威慑力的知情同意书,并努力确保参与者得到充分告知。

相似文献

1
The right to participate in research studies.参与研究的权利。
J Lab Clin Med. 1993 Aug;122(2):130-6.
2
Research ethics.研究伦理。
West Indian Med J. 1995 Dec;44(4):115-8.
3
Rethinking research ethics.重新思考研究伦理。
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Winter;5(1):7-28. doi: 10.1080/15265160590900678.
4
Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns.大学环境中的机构审查委员会:药物测试方案审查、知情同意及伦理问题
J Coll Univ Law. 1988 Fall;15(2):185-216.
5
Drug research in humans: the ethics of nonrandomized access.人体药物研究:非随机获取的伦理问题
Clin Pharm. 1989 May;8(5):366-70.
6
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性基因检测
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
7
Ethical issues in clinical research. Informed consent and risks versus benefits in the treatment of primary hypertension.临床研究中的伦理问题。原发性高血压治疗中的知情同意以及风险与获益
Nurs Clin North Am. 1989 Dec;24(4):1033-9.
8
When critical illness interferes with informed consent.
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1989;299:235-9.
9
Regulating research on the terminally ill: a proposal for heightened safeguards.规范对绝症患者的研究:加强保障措施的建议。
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1999 Spring;15(2):479-524.
10
In case of emergency: no need for consent.在紧急情况下:无需征得同意。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1997 Jan-Feb;27(1):7; discussion 7-12.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment of dissociative identity disorder: leveraging neurobiology to optimize success.治疗分离性身份障碍:利用神经生物学优化治疗效果。
Expert Rev Neurother. 2024 Mar;24(3):273-289. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2316153. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
2
Community Engagement Strategies for Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Populations.针对代表性不足的种族和族裔群体的社区参与策略
Mayo Clin Proc. 2024 Jan;99(1):159-171. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.07.015.
3
A Social Work Perspective on Paediatric and Adolescent Research Vulnerability.社会工作视角下的儿科与青少年研究中的脆弱性
Soc Work Soc Sci Rev. 2016 May;18(2):67-78. doi: 10.1921/swssr.v18i2.904. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
4
Culturally Competent Informed-Consent Process to Evaluate a Social Policy for Older Persons With Low Literacy: The Mexican Case.具有文化能力的知情同意过程,以评估一项针对低识字率老年人的社会政策:墨西哥案例。
Sage Open. 2016 Jul-Sep;6(3). doi: 10.1177/2158244016665886. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
5
An institutional strategy to increase minority recruitment to therapeutic trials.一项增加少数民族参与治疗性试验的机构策略。
Cancer Causes Control. 2013 Oct;24(10):1797-809. doi: 10.1007/s10552-013-0258-1. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
6
Decision-making and motivation to participate in biomedical research in southwest Nigeria.尼日利亚西南部参与生物医学研究的决策和动机。
Dev World Bioeth. 2012 Aug;12(2):87-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00326.x. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
7
Protecting people in research: a comparison between biomedical and traffic research.保护研究中的人:生物医学研究与交通研究之比较
Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Mar;13(1):99-115.
8
Gender differences in pharmacokinetics.药物代谢动力学中的性别差异。
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 1996 Apr-Jun;21(2):123-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03190260.
9
Women in clinical drug trials. An update.临床药物试验中的女性。最新情况。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1994 Dec;27(6):411-7. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199427060-00002.