Suppr超能文献

[日本和美国前列腺腺癌的组织病理学比较]

[Histopathological comparison of prostatic adenocarcinoma in Japan and the United States].

作者信息

Harada M, Nemoto R, Uchida K, Akaza H, Koiso K, Mostofi F K

机构信息

Laboratory of Pathology, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute.

出版信息

Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 1993 Jun;84(6):1110-18. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.84.1110.

Abstract

Histopathological comparison of clinical prostatic adenocarcinoma between Japan and the United States (US) has been made with retrospective analyses on 1,037 and 987 cases, respectively. All cases were histologically evaluated by the same pathologist (M.H.) without previous knowledge of clinical information according to application of the Japanese General Rules for Prostatic Cancer (JGRPC) based on the predominant degree of histological differentiation, the nuclear grading by WHO classification and the Gleason grading systems. The age distribution of the patients was slightly different among both groups. However, this difference appeared not to be essential, because there existed difference of the date on diagnosis between two groups. Even though considering this time difference on registration, much more cases from Japan had stage D disease. The observed incidence of the histological differentiation classified by JGRPC among over-all cases did not show significant difference, however, the incidence among the cases with same stage between two groups differed with some statistical significance. Much more cases from the US fell in well differentiated adenocarcinoma and frequency of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma was higher in the Japanese even in the cases diagnosed at advanced stages. The observed incidence of nuclear grade 3 was also higher in the Japanese. Gleason primary and secondary grade 5 and score 9-10 appeared more frequently in the cases from Japan.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

对日本和美国临床前列腺癌进行了组织病理学比较,分别对1037例和987例病例进行了回顾性分析。所有病例均由同一位病理学家(M.H.)进行组织学评估,在不了解临床信息的情况下,根据基于组织学分化优势程度、WHO分类的核分级以及Gleason分级系统的日本前列腺癌一般规则(JGRPC)进行评估。两组患者的年龄分布略有不同。然而,这种差异似乎并不关键,因为两组之间存在诊断日期的差异。即使考虑到登记时间的差异,来自日本的D期疾病病例更多。总体病例中按JGRPC分类的组织学分化观察发生率没有显著差异,然而,两组相同分期病例中的发生率存在一定统计学差异。来自美国的更多病例属于高分化腺癌,即使在晚期诊断的病例中,日本中度分化腺癌的发生率也更高。日本核3级的观察发生率也更高。Gleason一级和二级为5级以及评分9 - 10分在来自日本的病例中出现得更频繁。(摘要截短于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验