Guthertz L S, Lim S D, Jang Y, Duffey P S
Microbial Diseases Laboratory, State of California Department of Health Services, Berkeley 94704-1011, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jul;31(7):1876-81. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.7.1876-1881.1993.
Over a 1-year period, 502 mycobacterial cultures submitted to the Microbial Diseases Laboratory were identified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in parallel with standard biochemical methods. Identification by HPLC using a curvilinear gradient was achieved by comparing the chromatograms of the unknown cultures to chromatograms for known reference strains, together with calculation of peak height or peak area ratios, as necessary. The overall agreement between HPLC and biochemical identification was 97.2%. In addition, 7 of 12 cultures of Mycobacterium bovis were identified by HPLC as the BCG strain. Of 111 cultures biochemically identified as members of the M. avium complex (MAC), 108 were confirmed as MAC by DNA probe and 106 were confirmed by HPLC. Of the latter 106, 58 probe-positive strains were identified as M. avium, 38 were identified as M. intracellulare, and 10 were identified as Mycobacterium sp. strain "X" by HPLC. Of the remaining five nonchromogenic cultures, four had MAC-like chromatograms that did not match any in our library sufficiently to permit definitive identification. Of the latter four, two were confirmed as MAC strains by DNA probe and two were not. The last of the cultures biochemically identified as MAC (1 of 111) was a mixture of MAC and non-MAC strains. Overall, only 2 of 502 cultures yielded results by HPLC that differed from those obtained by standard biochemical methods. The HPLC result was confirmed in both cases by an independent national reference laboratory. In the 12 instances in which HPLC did not provide identification, the chromatograms were either uninterpretable or did not match available reference chromatograms. These findings show that the identification obtained by HPLC concurs well with that obtained by both the standard biochemical methods and the DNA probes. Thus, identification by HPLC provides mycobacteriology laboratories with a reproducible and specific method for accurate and timely identification of most medically important mycobacteria.
在1年的时间里,提交至微生物疾病实验室的502份分枝杆菌培养物采用高效液相色谱法(HPLC)并行标准生化方法进行鉴定。使用曲线梯度的HPLC鉴定是通过将未知培养物的色谱图与已知参考菌株的色谱图进行比较,并在必要时计算峰高或峰面积比来实现的。HPLC与生化鉴定之间的总体一致性为97.2%。此外,12份牛分枝杆菌培养物中有7份通过HPLC鉴定为卡介苗菌株。在111份经生化鉴定为鸟分枝杆菌复合群(MAC)成员的培养物中,108份通过DNA探针确认为MAC,106份通过HPLC确认为MAC。在这106份中,58份探针阳性菌株通过HPLC鉴定为鸟分枝杆菌,38份鉴定为胞内分枝杆菌,10份鉴定为分枝杆菌属“X”菌株。其余5份非产色培养物中,有4份具有类似MAC的色谱图,但与我们文库中的任何色谱图都不完全匹配,无法进行明确鉴定。在这4份中,2份通过DNA探针确认为MAC菌株,2份未确认。最后1份经生化鉴定为MAC的培养物(111份中的1份)是MAC和非MAC菌株的混合物。总体而言,502份培养物中只有2份通过HPLC得到的结果与标准生化方法得到的结果不同。这两种情况下的HPLC结果均得到了一个独立的国家参考实验室的确认。在HPLC未能提供鉴定结果的12个实例中,色谱图要么无法解读,要么与可用的参考色谱图不匹配。这些发现表明,HPLC获得的鉴定结果与标准生化方法和DNA探针获得的数据高度一致。因此,HPLC鉴定为分枝杆菌学实验室提供了一种可重复且特异的方法,用于准确、及时地鉴定大多数具有医学重要性的分枝杆菌。