Rohaly A M, Owsley C
Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Eye Foundation Hospital, University of Alabama, Birmingham 35294-0009.
J Opt Soc Am A. 1993 Jul;10(7):1591-9. doi: 10.1364/josaa.10.001591.
To determine whether a parabolic template is a good description of the contrast-sensitivity functions (CSF's) exhibited by older adults, the curve-fitting method of Pelli et al. [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3(13), P56 (1986)] was applied to contrast-sensitivity data from 100 older subjects (ages 53-85 years). Although the method resulted in reasonable fits for most subjects, closer inspection revealed that this technique may be problematic. A significant number of observers had functions that were nonparabolic, and for many subjects the error tended to be concentrated at the peak of the CSF. In addition, in contrast to the study of Pelli et al., the peak contrast sensitivities of the subjects were only weakly related to Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity and letter acuity. The data were also fitted with an asymmetric function of variable shape. Whereas this function provided a better fit to the nonparabolic CSF's, it resulted in inferior fits to most of the remaining data. These results demonstrate that the spatial CSF's of older adults cannot be described by a single parametric curve such as a parabola or a function of an exponential and that Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity and letter acuity are not adequate predictors of their peak contrast sensitivities.
为了确定抛物线模板是否能很好地描述老年人呈现出的对比敏感度函数(CSF),佩利等人[《美国光学学会志A》3(13),P56(1986)]的曲线拟合方法被应用于100名老年受试者(年龄在53 - 85岁之间)的对比敏感度数据。尽管该方法对大多数受试者得出了合理的拟合结果,但仔细检查发现该技术可能存在问题。相当数量的观察者具有非抛物线型的函数,并且对于许多受试者来说,误差往往集中在CSF的峰值处。此外,与佩利等人的研究不同,受试者的峰值对比敏感度与佩利 - 罗布森对比敏感度和字母视力仅存在微弱关联。数据还采用了可变形状的不对称函数进行拟合。虽然该函数对非抛物线型CSF拟合得更好,但对其余大部分数据的拟合效果较差。这些结果表明,老年人的空间CSF不能用单一的参数曲线(如抛物线或指数函数)来描述,并且佩利 - 罗布森对比敏感度和字母视力并不能充分预测他们的峰值对比敏感度。