Riding R, Douglas G
Assessment Research Unit, University of Birmingham.
Br J Educ Psychol. 1993 Jun;63 ( Pt 2):297-307. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01059.x.
The effect of text-plus-text versus text-plus-picture computer presentation conditions, and the students' cognitive styles, on learning performance was investigated. In the text-plus-text condition, the learning material content described the working of car braking systems. The text-plus-picture condition consisted of text with additional pictorial information. Fifty-nine 15-16-year-old students in a secondary school were randomly assigned, within sexes, to one of the conditions. Having worked through the computer presented material, they were given a post-test overall learning performance. Immediately following this, they did the Cognitive Styles Analysis (CSA) (Riding, 1991) which measures an individual's position on two cognitive style dimensions; Verbal-Imagery and Wholist-Analytic. It was found that the Verbal-Imagery cognitive style and presentation condition interacted in their effect on overall learning performance (p < .05). In the text-plus-picture condition Imagers were superior to Verbalisers, while the text-plus-text condition Verbalisers did better than Imagers. It was also observed that Imagers used more diagrams to illustrate their answers than Verbalisers. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for instruction.
研究了文本加文本与文本加图片的计算机呈现条件以及学生的认知风格对学习成绩的影响。在文本加文本条件下,学习材料内容描述了汽车制动系统的工作原理。文本加图片条件包括带有附加图片信息的文本。一所中学的59名15 - 16岁学生按性别随机分配到其中一种条件下。在学习完计算机呈现的材料后,他们进行了一次关于整体学习成绩的后测。紧接着,他们进行了认知风格分析(CSA)(赖丁,1991),该分析测量个体在两个认知风格维度上的位置:言语 - 表象和整体 - 分析。研究发现,言语 - 表象认知风格和呈现条件在对整体学习成绩的影响上存在交互作用(p < .05)。在文本加图片条件下,表象者优于言语者,而在文本加文本条件下,言语者比表象者表现更好。还观察到,表象者在回答中使用的图表比言语者更多。研究结果将根据其对教学的启示进行讨论。