Lyon M L
Department of Prehistory and Anthropology, The Faculties Australian National University, Canberra.
Cult Med Psychiatry. 1993 Mar;17(1):77-97. doi: 10.1007/BF01380601.
Psychoneuroimmunology claims to go beyond narrow biological perspectives of illness to consider behavioral components as an integral part of health and disease. The conceptualization of the embodiment of behavioral dimensions and how they may be represented in terms of interaction between the central nervous system and the immune system are therefore central theoretical issues. Psychoneuroimmunology is thus an arena in which questions about the body and person in context should come to the fore. There are multiple approaches in the psychoneuroimmunological literature, including those which attempt to address in some fashion the issue of the situatedness of illness. It is argued here that the problem of the representation of situatedness is the primary axis of tension in current research and writing in psychoneuroimmunology. Diverse attempts to represent extremely complex (and non-linear) relationships between behavioral and biological dimensions of 'immune system' functioning drive a number of researchers, though they operate under disciplinary, institutional, and funding constraints in the U.S. which tend to work against the development of competing or radical models within psychoneuroimmunology itself.
心理神经免疫学主张超越对疾病狭隘的生物学观点,将行为因素视为健康与疾病不可或缺的一部分。因此,行为维度的体现及其在中枢神经系统与免疫系统相互作用方面的表征方式,是核心理论问题。心理神经免疫学因而成为一个领域,在这个领域中,关于身体与处于特定情境中的人的问题应凸显出来。心理神经免疫学文献中有多种研究方法,包括那些试图以某种方式解决疾病情境问题的方法。本文认为,情境表征问题是当前心理神经免疫学研究与著述中主要的紧张冲突点。尽管美国的学科、机构和资金限制往往不利于心理神经免疫学内部竞争或激进模型的发展,但为呈现“免疫系统”功能的行为维度与生物学维度之间极其复杂(且非线性)的关系,众多研究者仍进行了各种尝试。