Suppr超能文献

人类婴儿视觉注意力的个体差异:关于单独的敏感化和习惯化过程的进一步证据。

Individual differences in the visual attention of human infants: further evidence for separate sensitization and habituation processes.

作者信息

Peterzell D H

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Colorado-Boulder.

出版信息

Dev Psychobiol. 1993 May;26(4):207-18. doi: 10.1002/dev.420260404.

Abstract

How many and what kinds of processes mediate infant visual attention? Are they influenced by stimulus "complexity?" Analyses were performed on visual fixation data from ninety 4-month-old infants; the time each infant spent looking at a black and white checkerboard pattern containing either 4 x 4, 12 x 12, or 20 x 20 checks per picture was measured for eight 10-s trials, with 10-s interstimulus intervals (Kaplan & Werner, 1986). Correlational and factor analyses revealed one significant source of individual variability (or factor) in the 4 x 4 data, and two significant sources in the 12 x 12 and 20 x 20 data. One factor gained strength over progressive trials and accounted for decreases in looking time. A second factor gained strength over the first few trials, then lost strength over the remaining trials, and accounted for initial increments in looking time. The two factors are consistent with a dual-process model of infant response dynamics; the first may represent habituation, a decremental process, and the second may represent sensitization, an incremental process that is activated by "complex" stimuli.

摘要

有多少种以及哪些过程介导了婴儿的视觉注意力?它们会受到刺激“复杂性”的影响吗?对90名4个月大婴儿的视觉注视数据进行了分析;在八次10秒的试验中,测量了每个婴儿注视每幅图片包含4×4、12×12或20×20个方格的黑白棋盘图案的时间,刺激间隔为10秒(卡普兰和沃纳,1986年)。相关分析和因子分析揭示了4×4数据中一个显著的个体变异性来源(或因子),以及12×12和20×20数据中的两个显著来源。一个因子在连续试验中增强,并导致注视时间减少。第二个因子在前几次试验中增强,然后在其余试验中减弱,并导致注视时间最初增加。这两个因子与婴儿反应动力学的双过程模型一致;第一个因子可能代表习惯化,一个递减过程,第二个因子可能代表敏感化,一个由“复杂”刺激激活的递增过程。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验