Suppr超能文献

Self-administered faecal occult blood tests do not increase compliance with screening for colorectal cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Verne J, Kettner J, Mant D, Farmer A, Mortenson N, Northover J

机构信息

Imperial Cancer Research Fund Colorectal Cancer Unit, St Marks Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Prev. 1993 Jul;2(4):301-5. doi: 10.1097/00008469-199307000-00003.

Abstract

In the UK, compliance with conventional faecal occult blood (FOB) tests such as Haemoccult is about 50% in the general population. It has been postulated that characteristics of the performance of conventional tests, in particular the need for dextrous gathering and manipulation of faeces, delay in receiving results, and the recommended dietary restrictions, may all diminish compliance. New FOB tests have been developed, popularly termed 'magic toilet paper' tests, which not only minimize faecal manipulation but are also self-reported. Compliance rates with two self-administered faecal occult blood tests (Early Detector and Coloscreen Self-Test) were compared with Haemoccult in a randomized trial involving 1,842 subjects aged 40-74 years. Use of self-administered FOB tests did not increase compliance significantly, with rates of 52.1% for Early Detector, 50.6% for Coloscreen and 49.1% for Haemoccult. Moreover, dietary restriction did not reduce compliance significantly (restricted 49.3%, unrestricted 51.8%). A wide variation (from 1.3% to 21.4%) in positivity rates was observed which was dependent on which of the three tests was used and whether dietary restrictions were applied. Since the physical aspects of test performance do not appear to determine an individual's decision to be screened, self-administered tests will not overcome the problem of poor compliance with FOB screening.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验