• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护护士的心理韧性、压力与职业倦怠

Hardiness, stress, and burnout among intensive care nurses.

作者信息

Wright T F, Blache C F, Ralph J, Luterman A

机构信息

University of South Alabama Medical Center Burn Center, Mobile.

出版信息

J Burn Care Rehabil. 1993 May-Jun;14(3):376-81. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199305000-00013.

DOI:10.1097/00004630-199305000-00013
PMID:8360247
Abstract

The purposes of this study were to determine whether hardiness is a predictor of burnout and whether it can buffer the effect of stress on burnout. Thirty-one registered nurses who work in intensive care units completed the Hardiness test, the Nursing Stress scale, and the Tedium scale. Descriptive statistics, correlational statistics, t tests, analysis of variance, and hierarchical multiple regressions were used to analyze the data. Results indicated that hardiness and burnout had a significant inverse relationship (r = 0.66). Stress and the stress-hardiness interaction term accounted for 29% of the variance in burnout scores. This study found hardiness to be a predictor of burnout and a buffer in the stress-burnout relationship. Furthermore, the relationship between hardiness and stress was found to be stronger than that between stress and burnout. Further study is needed to verify that hardiness is a stress mediator in nursing and to determine how to best promote hardiness in nurses.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定心理韧性是否是职业倦怠的预测指标,以及它是否能够缓冲压力对职业倦怠的影响。31名在重症监护病房工作的注册护士完成了心理韧性测试、护理压力量表和单调量表。使用描述性统计、相关性统计、t检验、方差分析和层次多元回归对数据进行分析。结果表明,心理韧性与职业倦怠呈显著负相关(r = 0.66)。压力和压力-心理韧性交互项占职业倦怠得分方差的29%。本研究发现心理韧性是职业倦怠的预测指标,也是压力-职业倦怠关系中的缓冲因素。此外,发现心理韧性与压力之间的关系比压力与职业倦怠之间的关系更强。需要进一步研究以验证心理韧性是护理工作中的压力调节因素,并确定如何最好地提升护士的心理韧性。

相似文献

1
Hardiness, stress, and burnout among intensive care nurses.重症监护护士的心理韧性、压力与职业倦怠
J Burn Care Rehabil. 1993 May-Jun;14(3):376-81. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199305000-00013.
2
The relationship of burnout, stress, and hardiness in nurses in a military medical center: a replicated descriptive study.军事医疗中心护士的职业倦怠、压力与心理韧性的关系:一项重复描述性研究。
J Burn Care Rehabil. 1999 Nov-Dec;20(6):515-22; discussion 514. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199920060-00016.
3
Personality hardiness, occupational stress, and burnout in critical care nurses.重症监护护士的人格坚韧性、职业压力和倦怠
Res Nurs Health. 1989 Jun;12(3):179-86. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770120308.
4
The relation of work stress, hardiness, and burnout among full-time hospital staff nurses.全职医院护士的工作压力、心理韧性与职业倦怠之间的关系。
J Nurs Staff Dev. 1996 Mar-Apr;12(2):81-5.
5
Work stress, hardiness, and burnout among hospital staff nurses.医院护士的工作压力、心理韧性和职业倦怠
Nurs Res. 1987 Nov-Dec;36(6):374-8.
6
[The relationship between hardiness, coping strategies and burnout in psychiatric nurses].[精神科护士的心理韧性、应对策略与职业倦怠之间的关系]
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2004 Jun;51(3):24-33.
7
Personality hardiness: an essential attribute for the ICU nurse?人格坚韧性:重症监护室护士的一项基本特质?
Dynamics. 2000 Winter;11(4):18-21.
8
Personality hardiness, ways of coping, social support and burnout in critical care nurses.重症监护护士的人格坚韧性、应对方式、社会支持与职业倦怠
J Adv Nurs. 1991 Jul;16(7):850-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1991.tb01767.x.
9
Stress, burnout and hardiness in R.T.s.放射技师的压力、职业倦怠与心理韧性
Radiol Technol. 2001 Mar-Apr;72(4):321-8.
10
Hardiness, coping, and burnout in the nursing workplace.护理工作场所中的心理韧性、应对方式与职业倦怠
J Prof Nurs. 1997 May-Jun;13(3):178-85. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(97)80069-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Profiling health professionals' personality traits, behaviour styles and emotional intelligence: a systematic review.分析卫生专业人员的个性特征、行为风格和情商:系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Feb 18;23(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04003-y.
2
[Burnout in primary care doctors of the province of cáceres].[卡塞雷斯省基层医疗医生的职业倦怠]
Aten Primaria. 2002 Mar 31;29(5):294-302. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(02)70567-2.