• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新一代烤瓷修复系统中复合树脂与瓷的粘结强度

Bond strength of composite resin to porcelain with newer generation porcelain repair systems.

作者信息

Appeldoorn R E, Wilwerding T M, Barkmeier W W

机构信息

Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Creighton University School of Dentistry, Omaha, Neb.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Jul;70(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90029-n.

DOI:10.1016/0022-3913(93)90029-n
PMID:8366459
Abstract

A laboratory study was conducted to evaluate the mean shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to porcelain with the use of eight newer generation repair systems. The range of shear bond strength after 24 hours of water storage was 23.5 +/- 5.3 MPa to 12.0 +/- 2.3 MPa. After 3 months of water storage and thermocycling, the bond strength range was 20.7 +/- 1.7 MPa to 4.2 +/- 1.0 MPa. Three of eight systems evaluated did not exhibit a significant (p > 0.05) decrease in bond strength when the 24-hour bond strengths were compared with the 3-month bond strengths. Most specimens failed cohesively in the porcelain at 24 hours, but at 3 months only four of the eight systems showed consistent failures in the porcelain.

摘要

进行了一项实验室研究,以评估使用八种新一代修复系统时复合树脂与瓷粘结的平均剪切粘结强度。储水24小时后的剪切粘结强度范围为23.5±5.3兆帕至12.0±2.3兆帕。储水3个月并进行热循环后,粘结强度范围为20.7±1.7兆帕至4.2±1.0兆帕。在将24小时粘结强度与3个月粘结强度进行比较时,评估的八个系统中有三个系统的粘结强度没有显著降低(p>0.05)。大多数标本在24小时时在瓷中发生内聚破坏,但在3个月时,八个系统中只有四个系统在瓷中表现出一致的破坏。

相似文献

1
Bond strength of composite resin to porcelain with newer generation porcelain repair systems.新一代烤瓷修复系统中复合树脂与瓷的粘结强度
J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Jul;70(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90029-n.
2
In vitro study of the effect of thermo- and load-cycling on the bond strength of porcelain repair systems.
J Oral Rehabil. 1999 Feb;26(2):130-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00346.x.
3
Effect of porcelain surface treatments on bond strengths of composite resin bonded to porcelain.
J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Oct;72(4):355-9. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90553-3.
4
Shear bond strength of composite resin porcelain repair materials bonded to metal and porcelain.
J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Nov;64(5):529-33. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90122-s.
5
Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: Part 1. Comparison of shear bond strengths between different metal-resin bonding systems and a metal-ceramic system.间接树脂复合材料与金属的粘结:第1部分。不同金属-树脂粘结系统与金属-陶瓷系统之间的剪切粘结强度比较。
Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Nov-Dec;16(6):635-9.
6
Effect of laboratory procedures and thermocycling on the shear bond strength of resin-metal bonding systems.实验室操作和热循环对树脂-金属粘结系统剪切粘结强度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Aug;90(2):184-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00261-0.
7
Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates.2种口腔内瓷修复系统与瓷或金属基底的剪切粘结强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Nov;86(5):526-31. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.119843.
8
Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to porcelain following etching with Er:YAG laser versus hydrofluoric acid.与氢氟酸蚀刻相比,经铒钇铝石榴石(Er:YAG)激光蚀刻后正畸托槽与瓷的剪切粘结强度。
Orthodontics (Chic.). 2013;14(1):e82-7. doi: 10.11607/ortho.856.
9
Comparison of composite resin-to-porcelain bond strength with three adhesives.三种粘合剂对复合树脂与瓷粘结强度的比较。
Gen Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;48(4):418-21.
10
Shear bond strength between metal alloy and a ceramic system, submitted to different thermocycling immersion times.金属合金与陶瓷系统之间的剪切粘结强度,经受不同的热循环浸泡时间。
Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2007;20(2):97-102.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of 4-META on microtensile bond strength of cements to ceramics.4-甲基丙烯酸甲酯对粘结剂与陶瓷微拉伸粘结强度的影响。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2024 Feb 22;21:19. eCollection 2024.
2
Repair bond strength of composite resin to zirconia restorations after different thermal cycles.不同热循环后复合树脂与氧化锆修复体的修复粘结强度。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2019 Oct;11(5):297-304. doi: 10.4047/jap.2019.11.5.297. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
3
Comparing two intraoral porcelain repair systems for shear bond strength in repaired cohesive and adhesive fractures, for porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations: An study.
比较两种口腔内瓷修复系统在修复烤瓷熔附金属修复体的内聚性和黏附性骨折时的抗剪粘结强度:一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2019 Oct-Dec;19(4):362-368. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_120_19. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
4
Disilicate Dental Ceramic Surface Preparation by 1070 nm Fiber Laser: Thermal and Ultrastructural Analysis.1070纳米光纤激光对双硅酸盐牙科陶瓷的表面处理:热分析和超微结构分析
Bioengineering (Basel). 2018 Jan 31;5(1):10. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering5010010.
5
Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment.不同表面处理后两种瓷修复系统的剪切粘结强度比较。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Apr-Jun;6(2):196-200. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.156045.
6
Microshear bond strength of composite resins to enamel and porcelain substrates utilizing unfilled versus filled resins.使用未填充树脂与填充树脂时复合树脂与牙釉质和瓷基底的微剪切粘结强度。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014 Nov;11(6):636-44.
7
Addition of a pontic to all-ceramic Turkom-Cera fixed partial denture restorations.在全瓷Turkom-Cera固定局部义齿修复体上添加桥体。
Eur J Dent. 2013 Apr;7(2):233-238. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.110194.
8
To evaluate the effect of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength of three different intraoral ceramic repair systems: an in vitro study.评估不同表面处理对三种不同口腔内陶瓷修复系统剪切粘结强度的影响:一项体外研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013 Sep;13(3):315-20. doi: 10.1007/s13191-013-0270-x. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
9
Influence of surface treatment and cyclic loading on the durability of repaired all-ceramic crowns.表面处理和循环载荷对修复全瓷冠耐久性的影响。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2010 Mar-Apr;18(2):194-200. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572010000200015.
10
Ceramic restoration repair: report of two cases.陶瓷修复体修复:两例报告。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2009 Mar-Apr;17(2):140-4. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000200013.