Ultrasonography in the initial evaluation and follow-up of blunt abdominal injury.

BACKGROUND

Ultrasonography has been routinely performed in the assessment of blunt abdominal injury at our department of surgery since 1980. To establish its reliability, a retrospective study was carried out on 818 consecutive patients in the years 1980 to 1990.

METHODS

Seven hundred twenty six patients underwent real-time ultrasonographic examination of the abdomen. Indication for ultrasonography included all cases evaluated for blunt abdominal trauma. Ninety two patients before 1985 were excluded.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy (37.2%) patients underwent laparotomy, 252 patients (34.7%) because of ultrasonographic diagnosis. Celiotomy was nontherapeutic in 28 patients; 26 of these patients had positive findings from ultrasonography (false positive, 3.6%). Eighteen patients with negative findings from ultrasonography also underwent laparotomy, which was nontherapeutic in two patients (false negative, 2.2%). Four hundred fifty six patients (62.8%) were managed without operation, relying on initial and follow-up ultrasonography, which was negative in 386 (53.2%) and positive in 70 patients (9.6%). The accuracy of ultrasonography was 94.2%, with 91.9% sensitivity, 96.0% specificity, and 94.9% predictive value. The rate of delayed recognition of documented visceral injury was 5.1%, but no false-negative findings from ultrasonography were noted among these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasonography has proved to be a thoroughly reliable, cost efficient, and noninvasive modality in primary evaluation and follow-up of blunt abdominal trauma.