• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一种鸣禽——欧洲椋鸟(Sturnus vulgaris)中听觉频率泛化以及八度泛化的缺失。

Auditory frequency generalization and a failure to find octave generalization in a songbird, the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris).

作者信息

Cynx J

机构信息

Rockefeller University Field Center for Ecology and Ethology, Millbrook, New York 12545.

出版信息

J Comp Psychol. 1993 Jun;107(2):140-6. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.107.2.140.

DOI:10.1037/0735-7036.107.2.140
PMID:8370267
Abstract

Many species of songbirds have absolute pitch perception. They memorize tones when discriminating between sequences and fail to generalize to novel frequency ranges. I examined frequency generalization in starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) that were trained to discriminate between individual frequencies. Starlings were tested for frequency generalization after training on 2- and 3-tone discriminations. There was no evidence for octave generalization, which is a hallmark of human absolute pitch perception. This suggests that avian absolute pitch perception must not be interpreted as identical with that in humans. A control experiment with 1-tone discriminations indicated that the presence of lit response keys affects the shape of the generalization gradients. Lit response keys are a common feature in avian auditory perception experiments, and this control experiment cautions that results may be affected by this seemingly minor procedural change.

摘要

许多鸣禽物种具有绝对音高感知能力。它们在区分序列时会记住音调,并且无法将其推广到新的频率范围。我研究了在经过训练以区分各个频率的椋鸟(Sturnus vulgaris)中的频率泛化情况。在对椋鸟进行2音和3音辨别训练后,对其进行频率泛化测试。没有证据表明存在八度泛化,而八度泛化是人类绝对音高感知的一个标志。这表明鸟类的绝对音高感知不能被解释为与人类的相同。一项单音辨别控制实验表明,亮起的反应键的存在会影响泛化梯度的形状。亮起的反应键是鸟类听觉感知实验中的一个常见特征,并且该控制实验提醒人们,结果可能会受到这种看似微小的程序变化的影响。

相似文献

1
Auditory frequency generalization and a failure to find octave generalization in a songbird, the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris).在一种鸣禽——欧洲椋鸟(Sturnus vulgaris)中听觉频率泛化以及八度泛化的缺失。
J Comp Psychol. 1993 Jun;107(2):140-6. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.107.2.140.
2
Songbirds use spectral shape, not pitch, for sound pattern recognition.鸣禽通过频谱形状而非音高来进行声音模式识别。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Feb 9;113(6):1666-71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1515380113. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
3
Perceptual organization of auditory temporal patterns in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).欧洲椋鸟(Sturnus vulgaris)听觉时间模式的知觉组织。
Percept Psychophys. 1993 Nov;54(5):567-78. doi: 10.3758/bf03211781.
4
Perception of missing fundamental by a species of songbird (Sturnus vulgaris).一种鸣禽(家八哥)对基音缺失的感知。
J Comp Psychol. 1986 Dec;100(4):356-60.
5
Relative pitch perception in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): further evidence for an elusive phenomenon.欧洲椋鸟(Sturnus vulgaris)的相对音高感知:一种难以捉摸现象的进一步证据。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1989 Apr;15(2):137-46.
6
European starlings (sturnus vulgaris) discriminate rhythms by rate, not temporal patterns.欧洲椋鸟(sturnus vulgaris)通过频率而非时间模式来区分节奏。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 Apr;149(4):2546. doi: 10.1121/10.0004215.
7
Auditory scene analysis by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris): perceptual segregation of tone sequences.欧洲椋鸟(家八哥)的听觉场景分析:音调序列的感知分离
J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Jun;103(6):3581-7. doi: 10.1121/1.423063.
8
Auditory scene analysis by songbirds: stream segregation of birdsong by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).鸣禽的听觉场景分析:欧洲椋鸟(Sturnus vulgaris)对鸟鸣声的声流分离
J Comp Psychol. 1997 Mar;111(1):3-13. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.111.1.3.
9
A psychophysical measure of pitch discrimination loss resulting from a frequency range constraint in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).对欧洲椋鸟(Sturnus vulgaris)因频率范围限制导致的音高辨别损失的一种心理物理学测量。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1986 Oct;12(4):394-402.
10
Using network models of absolute pitch to compare frequency-range discriminations across avian species.使用绝对音高的网络模型比较鸟类物种间的频率范围辨别能力。
Behav Processes. 2010 May;84(1):421-7. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.01.010. Epub 2010 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Do rats () perceive octave equivalence, a critical human cross-cultural aspect of pitch perception?大鼠是否能感知八度等效性,这是人类音高感知中一个关键的跨文化方面? (括号内“()”部分原文无对应中文,保留原样)
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 May 29;11(5):221181. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221181. eCollection 2024 May.
2
In "Tone" with dogs: exploring canine musicality.与犬共鸣:探索犬类的音乐性。
Anim Cogn. 2024 May 16;27(1):38. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01875-5.
3
Recognizing structure in novel tunes: differences between human and rats.识别新颖曲调中的结构:人类与大鼠的差异。
Anim Cogn. 2024 Mar 2;27(1):17. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01848-8.
4
Lessons learned in animal acoustic cognition through comparisons with humans.通过与人类的比较来了解动物的听觉认知。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jan;26(1):97-116. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01735-0. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
5
Pitch chroma information is processed in addition to pitch height information with more than two pitch-range categories.音高色度信息与超过两个音高范围类别的音高高度信息一起被处理。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jul;84(5):1757-1771. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02496-1. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
6
Detecting surface changes in a familiar tune: exploring pitch, tempo and timbre.探测熟悉曲调中的表面变化:探索音高、节奏和音色。
Anim Cogn. 2022 Aug;25(4):951-960. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01604-w. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
7
Animal Pitch Perception: Melodies and Harmonies.动物的音高感知:旋律与和声。
Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2017;12:5-18. doi: 10.3819/CCBR.2017.120002.
8
Searching for the origins of musicality across species.探寻跨物种音乐性的起源。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 19;370(1664):20140094. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0094.
9
The use of interval ratios in consonance perception by rats (Rattus norvegicus) and humans (Homo sapiens).大鼠(褐家鼠)和人类(智人)在和谐感知中对音程比率的运用。
J Comp Psychol. 2015 Feb;129(1):42-51. doi: 10.1037/a0037991. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
10
Perception of frequency, amplitude, and azimuth of a vibratory dipole source by the octavolateralis system of goldfish (Carassius auratus).金鱼(Carassius auratus)八侧线系统对振动偶极子源频率、振幅和方位的感知。
J Comp Psychol. 2011 Aug;125(3):286-95. doi: 10.1037/a0023499.