Murphy J G, Cayten C G, Stahl W M, Glasser M
Institute for Trauma and Emergency Care, New York Medical College, Valhalla 10595.
J Trauma. 1993 Sep;35(3):356-62. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199309000-00005.
The effects of dual responses [Basic Life Support (BLS) and Advanced Life Support (ALS)] on the outcomes of trauma patients were evaluated. Outcomes included changes in physiologic measurements between the scene and the emergency department (ED), and survival to hospital discharge. Data for 2394 patients with penetrating, motor vehicle crash (MVC), or other blunt injuries were included. Changes in physiologic measurements (Revised Trauma Scores) between the prehospital and ED settings were positively associated with documented ALS or dual response care. Survival to hospital discharge among penetrating injury patients was negatively related to dual responses, whereas that among MVC patients was positively associated with dual responses. Parallel results were found for a subset of more severely injured patients. Future research should confirm and refine these results so that protocols for the appropriate use of dual response runs can be developed.
评估了双重反应[基础生命支持(BLS)和高级生命支持(ALS)]对创伤患者预后的影响。预后包括现场与急诊科(ED)之间生理指标的变化以及出院生存率。纳入了2394例穿透伤、机动车碰撞(MVC)或其他钝性损伤患者的数据。院前与急诊科环境之间生理指标的变化(修订创伤评分)与记录的ALS或双重反应护理呈正相关。穿透伤患者的出院生存率与双重反应呈负相关,而MVC患者的出院生存率与双重反应呈正相关。在一组伤势更严重的患者中也发现了类似结果。未来的研究应证实并完善这些结果,以便制定适当使用双重反应流程的方案。