Sampalis J S, Lavoie A, Williams J I, Mulder D S, Kalina M
Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Trauma. 1993 Feb;34(2):252-61. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199302000-00014.
A sample of 360 severely injured patients was selected from a cohort of 8007 trauma victims followed prospectively from the time of injury to death or discharge. A case referent study was used to test the association between on-site care, total prehospital time, and level of care at the receiving hospital with short-term survival. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that use of Advanced Life Support (ALS) at the scene was not associated with survival, whereas treatment at a level I compatible hospital was associated with a 38% reduction in the odds of dying, which approached statistical significance. Total prehospital time over 60 minutes was associated with a statistically significant adjusted relative odds of dying (OR = 3.0). The results of this study support the need for regionalization of trauma care and fail to show a benefit associated with ALS.
从8007名创伤受害者队列中选取了360名重伤患者,这些患者从受伤时起就被前瞻性地跟踪直至死亡或出院。采用病例对照研究来检验现场护理、院前总时间以及接收医院的护理水平与短期生存之间的关联。多项逻辑回归分析表明,现场使用高级生命支持(ALS)与生存无关,而在一级兼容医院接受治疗与死亡几率降低38%相关,这接近统计学显著性。院前总时间超过60分钟与经统计学调整后的死亡相对几率显著相关(OR = 3.0)。本研究结果支持创伤护理区域化的必要性,且未显示出与ALS相关的益处。