Beyer-Boon M E, Voorn-den Hollander M J
Acta Cytol. 1978 Nov-Dec;22(6):589-93.
Information concerning the main pitfalls of cytopreparatory techniques, e.g., cell loss, is of paramount importance for general acceptance of the routine use of urinary cytology. Therefore, we studied the cell yield obtained with five Papanicolaou and two May-Grünwald-Giemsa (MGG) smear techniques commonly used in diagnostic cytology laboratories, and compared the results with those obtained with the Millipore filter technique. All smear methods using wet fixation gave very low cell harvests (2-26%), and all methods using air drying gave high cell yield (55-95%), the spray fixation method giving intermediate results (about 40%). Since the morphometric studies showed that there was no preferential cell loss, the cells remaining on the slides can be considered representative of the original cell population. However, if the cell concentration of the urinary sample is extremely low, the Millipore filter and the albumin MGG methods, in both of which cell loss is minimal, are recommended. The results obtained with the spray fixation Papanicolaou method are quantitatively acceptable and qualitatively excellent.
关于细胞制备技术的主要缺陷(如细胞丢失)的信息,对于尿细胞学常规应用的广泛接受至关重要。因此,我们研究了诊断细胞学实验室常用的五种巴氏染色法和两种迈-格-姬氏(MGG)染色法的细胞收获率,并将结果与微孔滤膜技术的结果进行比较。所有采用湿固定的涂片方法收获的细胞都非常少(2%-26%),而所有采用空气干燥的方法收获的细胞产量都很高(55%-95%),喷雾固定法的结果居中(约40%)。由于形态计量学研究表明不存在优先的细胞丢失,留在载玻片上的细胞可被视为原始细胞群体的代表。然而,如果尿液样本的细胞浓度极低,建议采用微孔滤膜法和白蛋白MGG法,这两种方法的细胞丢失都很少。喷雾固定巴氏染色法获得的结果在数量上是可以接受的,在质量上是优异的。