Marijnissen J P, Baas P, Beek J F, van Moll J H, van Zandwijk N, Star W M
Department of Clinical Physics, Dr. Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Photochem Photobiol. 1993 Jul;58(1):92-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1993.tb04908.x.
Endobronchial photodynamic therapy (EB-PDT) using photofrin as the photosensitizer is currently being evaluated as a new treatment modality for inoperable endobronchial tumors. One of the current problems with EB-PDT is the lack of adequate light dosimetry, which hampers proper interpretation of treatment results. In this study exploratory light dosimetry experiments were performed in plastic bronchus models using either a microlens-tipped fiber (suitable for illumination of small superficial tumors) or a cylindrical diffuser fiber (suitable for intraluminal illumination or interstitial illumination of partially obstructing tumors). It is shown that the light fluence prescriptions of current clinical protocols yield a different fluence in tissue for each illumination modality. Depending on the actual placement of the cylindrical diffuser within the lumen, the light fluence at 5 mm depth in the homogeneous tissue model may vary by a factor of 3. The results were confirmed by in vivo experiments in the trachea of a pig. There is a possibility of enhanced tissue response by accidental hyperthermia induced during EB-PDT. The temperature rise was therefore estimated in vivo using a rat tumor model to mimic clinical EB-PDT. Temperature rises of at least 5 degrees C and 10 degrees C can be expected for intraluminal and intratumoral illumination, respectively, at 3.5 +/- 1 mm depth in tissue and 400 mW/cm diffuser output. Light fluence and its distribution in the bronchus strongly depend on the geometry and the optical properties of the tissue as well as on the technique of illumination. As a result of inadequate dosimetry, significant variations in treatment response between patients may be expected.
使用光敏剂卟吩姆钠的支气管内光动力疗法(EB-PDT)目前正作为一种针对无法手术的支气管内肿瘤的新治疗方式进行评估。EB-PDT当前存在的问题之一是缺乏足够的光剂量测定,这妨碍了对治疗结果的正确解读。在本研究中,使用微透镜尖端光纤(适用于小的浅表肿瘤照明)或圆柱形扩散光纤(适用于部分阻塞性肿瘤的腔内照明或间质照明)在塑料支气管模型中进行了探索性光剂量测定实验。结果表明,当前临床方案的光通量处方在每种照明方式下在组织中产生的通量不同。根据圆柱形扩散器在管腔内的实际放置情况,均匀组织模型中5毫米深度处的光通量可能相差3倍。该结果在猪气管的体内实验中得到了证实。在EB-PDT期间,有可能因意外的热疗导致组织反应增强。因此,使用大鼠肿瘤模型在体内估计温度升高以模拟临床EB-PDT。在组织中3.5±1毫米深度处且扩散器输出为400毫瓦/平方厘米时,腔内照明和瘤内照明分别预计温度升高至少5摄氏度和10摄氏度。光通量及其在支气管中的分布强烈依赖于组织的几何形状和光学特性以及照明技术。由于剂量测定不足,预计患者之间的治疗反应会有显著差异。