Williamson W A, Ellis F H, Streitz J M, Shahian D M
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01805.
Ann Thorac Surg. 1993 Sep;56(3):447-51; discussion 451-2. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(93)90878-l.
Between January 1970 and October 1992, 119 patients underwent 126 repairs of a paraesophageal hiatal hernia at the Lahey Clinic. Seven patients with a recurrent hernia required reoperation. Of the procedures, 19 (15%) included an antireflux procedure because of severe reflux symptoms and objective evidence of reflux demonstrated by grade 2 esophagitis on endoscopy, manometric evidence of a hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter pressure (< or = 10 mm Hg), positive results on 24-hour pH monitoring, or all three methods. Follow-up ranged from 6 months to 18 years with a median of 61.5 months, and the results of 115 operations were analyzed. Symptomatic results were good to excellent after 96 (83.5%) of these 115 operations. Thirteen symptomatic paraesophageal hernias recurred in 12 patients (one recurrence per 58 patient-years of follow-up). Severe reflux symptoms accompanied by endoscopic evidence of esophagitis developed in 2 patients who had not undergone an antireflux procedure at the time of repair of the hernia. We conclude that an antireflux procedure is rarely required in patients undergoing repair of a paraesophageal hiatal hernia and should be employed only when objective evidence of reflux is seen preoperatively.
1970年1月至1992年10月期间,119例患者在Lahey诊所接受了126次食管旁裂孔疝修补术。7例复发性疝患者需要再次手术。在这些手术中,19例(15%)因严重反流症状以及内镜检查显示2级食管炎、食管下括约肌压力降低(≤10mmHg)的测压证据、24小时pH监测阳性结果或这三种方法均显示反流客观证据而进行了抗反流手术。随访时间为6个月至18年,中位数为61.5个月,对115例手术结果进行了分析。在这115例手术中,96例(83.5%)术后症状改善良好至极佳。12例患者出现13例有症状的食管旁疝复发(每58患者年随访出现1例复发)。2例在疝修补时未进行抗反流手术的患者出现了伴有食管炎内镜证据的严重反流症状。我们得出结论,食管旁裂孔疝修补患者很少需要进行抗反流手术,仅在术前有反流客观证据时才应采用。