Schiffman M H, Bauer H M, Hoover R N, Glass A G, Cadell D M, Rush B B, Scott D R, Sherman M E, Kurman R J, Wacholder S
Epidemiology and Biostatistics Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Jun 16;85(12):958-64. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.12.958.
Experimental studies have provided strong evidence that human papillomavirus (HPV) is the long-sought venereal cause of cervical neoplasia, but the epidemiologic evidence has been inconsistent.
Given improvements in HPV testing that have revealed a strong link between sexual activity history and cervical HPV infection, we conducted a large case-control study of HPV and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) to evaluate whether sexual behavior and the other established risk factors for CIN influence risk primarily via HPV infection.
We studied 500 women with CIN and 500 control subjects receiving cytologic screening at Kaiser Permanente, a large prepaid health plan, in Portland, Ore. The established epidemiologic risk factors for CIN were assessed by telephone interview. We performed HPV testing of cervicovaginal lavage specimens by gene amplification using polymerase chain reaction with a consensus primer to target the L1 gene region of HPV. Unconditional logistic regression analysis was used to estimate relative risk of CIN and to adjust the epidemiologic associations for HPV test results to demonstrate whether the associations were mediated by HPV.
The case subjects demonstrated the typical epidemiologic profile of CIN: They had more sex partners, more cigarette smoking, earlier ages at first sexual intercourse, and lower socioeconomic status. Statistical adjustment for HPV infection substantially reduced the size of each of these case-control differences. Seventy-six percent of cases could be attributed to HPV infection; the results of cytologic review suggested that the true percentage was even higher. Once HPV infection was taken into account, an association of parity with risk of CIN was observed in both HPV-negative and HPV-positive women.
The data show that the great majority of all grades of CIN can be attributed to HPV infection, particularly with the cancer-associated types of HPV.
In light of this conclusion, the investigation of the natural history of HPV has preventive as well as etiologic importance.
实验研究已提供有力证据表明,人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)是长期以来探寻的宫颈肿瘤的性传播病因,但流行病学证据一直不一致。
鉴于HPV检测技术的改进揭示了性活动史与宫颈HPV感染之间的紧密联系,我们开展了一项关于HPV与宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)的大型病例对照研究,以评估性行为及其他已确定的CIN危险因素是否主要通过HPV感染来影响患病风险。
我们对俄勒冈州波特兰市凯泽永久医疗集团(一家大型预付健康计划机构)接受细胞学筛查的500名CIN女性患者和500名对照受试者进行了研究。通过电话访谈评估已确定的CIN流行病学危险因素。我们使用针对HPV L1基因区域的共识引物,通过聚合酶链反应进行基因扩增,对宫颈阴道灌洗标本进行HPV检测。采用无条件逻辑回归分析来估计CIN的相对风险,并针对HPV检测结果调整流行病学关联,以证明这些关联是否由HPV介导。
病例组呈现出CIN典型的流行病学特征:她们有更多性伴侣、吸烟更多、首次性交年龄更小且社会经济地位更低。对HPV感染进行统计学调整后,这些病例对照差异的幅度均大幅降低。76%的病例可归因于HPV感染;细胞学复查结果表明实际比例甚至更高。一旦考虑到HPV感染,在HPV阴性和HPV阳性女性中均观察到产次与CIN风险之间的关联。
数据表明,所有级别CIN的绝大多数病例可归因于HPV感染,尤其是与癌症相关类型的HPV。
鉴于这一结论,对HPV自然史的研究具有预防和病因学两方面的重要意义。