Suppr超能文献

测量婴儿体温:“宝贝检查”之争中的科学与社会禁忌

Taking babies' temperatures: science versus social taboos in battle over Baby Check.

作者信息

Handysides S

机构信息

British Medical Journal, London.

出版信息

BMJ. 1993 Sep 11;307(6905):673-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6905.673.

Abstract

Baby Check, a scoring system for assessing the severity of illness in babies under 6 months old, has not met with the success its developers expected. The inclusion of rectal temperature in the assessment was strongly opposed by the Royal College of Midwives, which refused to alter its view despite evidence of the safety and accuracy of rectal thermometry. British parents appear not to like rectal thermometers either. Most other medical bodies have supported Baby Check and the reason for midwives' opposition may have more to do with professional pique at not being consulted than clinical wisdom.

摘要

“婴儿健康检查”是一种用于评估6个月以下婴儿疾病严重程度的评分系统,但并未取得其开发者预期的成功。皇家助产士学院强烈反对在评估中纳入直肠温度,尽管有证据表明直肠测温法的安全性和准确性,但该学院仍拒绝改变其观点。英国父母似乎也不喜欢直肠体温计。大多数其他医学机构都支持“婴儿健康检查”,助产士反对的原因可能更多地与未被咨询而产生的职业不满有关,而非临床智慧。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba0f/1678998/0ee7b1d0eefa/bmj00038-0045-a.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验