Shanks D R
Department of Psychology, University College London, UK.
Br J Psychol. 1993 Aug;84 ( Pt 3):319-54. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1993.tb02486.x.
This article reviews experimental data from human instrumental learning tasks in which people acquire knowledge about the consequences of their actions. The main part of the paper examines the stimulus conditions which appear to control the acquisition of instrumental knowledge. These conditions include contiguity between the action and outcome, the degree of contingency between them, and also the extent to which the action is a good relative predictor of the outcome. Several accounts are examined of the mechanism by which instrumental knowledge might be acquired, including: (i) a variety of rule-based models, in which learning consists of the acquisition of knowledge about statistical relationships between contingent events; (ii) a relative contiguity model, in which learning involves the acquisition of knowledge about temporal relationships; and (iii) an associative model, in which learning involves the formation of mental associations which are updated by a learning rule. The review indicates that at present, the data seem most consistent with the associative learning model. However, there remain empirical phenomena which have resisted theoretical analysis. A variety of questions which future research might profitably explore are considered.
本文回顾了来自人类工具性学习任务的实验数据,在这些任务中人们获取关于自身行为后果的知识。论文的主要部分考察了似乎控制工具性知识习得的刺激条件。这些条件包括行为与结果之间的接近性、它们之间的 contingency 程度,以及行为作为结果的良好相对预测指标的程度。考察了关于工具性知识可能如何习得的几种机制解释,包括:(i)各种基于规则的模型,其中学习包括获取关于偶然事件之间统计关系的知识;(ii)相对接近性模型,其中学习涉及获取关于时间关系的知识;以及(iii)联想模型,其中学习涉及形成通过学习规则更新的心理联想。该综述表明,目前数据似乎与联想学习模型最为一致。然而,仍有一些实证现象难以进行理论分析。考虑了未来研究可能有益探索的各种问题。