• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿斯巴甜导致荨麻疹/血管性水肿的可能性并不比安慰剂高:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究的结果。

Aspartame is no more likely than placebo to cause urticaria/angioedema: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study.

作者信息

Geha R, Buckley C E, Greenberger P, Patterson R, Polmar S, Saxon A, Rohr A, Yang W, Drouin M

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1993 Oct;92(4):513-20. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(93)90075-q.

DOI:10.1016/0091-6749(93)90075-q
PMID:8409113
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anecdotes and single case reports have suggested that the high-intensity sweetener, aspartame, may be associated with allergic/hypersensitivity-type reactions.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, placebo-controlled clinical study to evaluate individuals who had experienced urticaria and/or angioedema allegedly associated with ingestion of an aspartame-containing product. Despite extensive recruiting efforts over 4 years, only 21 subjects could be enrolled. After admission to clinical research units, subjects were given aspartame and placebo in a randomized, double-blind, crossover fashion. Subjects received, on different days, increasing doses (50, 300, 600 mg) of aspartame and placebo at 8:00 AM, 10:00 AM, and noon. Subjects who weighed less than 40 kg received one half of these doses. Conversion products of aspartame, aspartyl-phenylalanine diketopiperazine and beta-aspartame, were also included in the aspartame arm of the study. Positive reactions were defined as urticaria (hives with wheals 4 mm or more in diameter with a collective diameter of at least 15 mm or one or more hives with a wheal of 4 mm or greater with a flare of 8 mm or greater) or as angioedema.

RESULTS

According to these criteria, four reactions were observed; two followed aspartame ingestion and two followed placebo ingestion (p = 1.00). The incidence of other adverse experiences was no different after aspartame versus placebo ingestion (p = 0.289).

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that aspartame and its conversion products are no more likely than placebo to cause urticaria and/or angioedema reactions in subjects with a history consistent with hypersensitivity to aspartame.

摘要

背景

轶事和单病例报告表明,高强度甜味剂阿斯巴甜可能与过敏/超敏反应有关。

方法

我们进行了一项多中心、安慰剂对照的临床研究,以评估那些据称因摄入含阿斯巴甜产品而出现荨麻疹和/或血管性水肿的个体。尽管在4年时间里进行了广泛的招募工作,但仅招募到21名受试者。进入临床研究单位后,受试者以随机、双盲、交叉的方式服用阿斯巴甜和安慰剂。受试者在不同日期的上午8点、10点和中午接受递增剂量(50、300、600毫克)的阿斯巴甜和安慰剂。体重不足40公斤的受试者服用这些剂量的一半。阿斯巴甜的转化产物,天冬氨酰苯丙氨酸二酮哌嗪和β-阿斯巴甜,也被纳入研究的阿斯巴甜组。阳性反应定义为荨麻疹(直径4毫米或更大的风团,总直径至少15毫米,或一个或多个直径4毫米或更大的风团,伴有8毫米或更大的红晕)或血管性水肿。

结果

根据这些标准,观察到4例反应;2例在服用阿斯巴甜后出现,2例在服用安慰剂后出现(p = 1.00)。服用阿斯巴甜和安慰剂后,其他不良经历的发生率没有差异(p = 0.289)。

结论

这些结果表明,在有阿斯巴甜超敏反应史的受试者中,阿斯巴甜及其转化产物引起荨麻疹和/或血管性水肿反应的可能性并不比安慰剂更高。

相似文献

1
Aspartame is no more likely than placebo to cause urticaria/angioedema: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study.阿斯巴甜导致荨麻疹/血管性水肿的可能性并不比安慰剂高:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究的结果。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1993 Oct;92(4):513-20. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(93)90075-q.
2
Suspected tartrazine-induced acute urticaria/angioedema is only rarely reproducible by oral rechallenge.疑似酒石黄诱发的急性荨麻疹/血管性水肿很少能通过口服激发试验再现。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2003 Dec;33(12):1725-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2003.01825.x.
3
Aspartame and seizure susceptibility: results of a clinical study in reportedly sensitive individuals.阿斯巴甜与癫痫易感性:对据报道敏感个体的一项临床研究结果
Epilepsia. 1995 Mar;36(3):270-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1995.tb00995.x.
4
A combined single-blind, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to determine the reproducibility of hypersensitivity reactions to aspartame.一项联合单盲、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,以确定对阿斯巴甜过敏反应的可重复性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1991 Apr;87(4):821-7. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(91)90128-b.
5
Aspartame-induced urticaria.阿斯巴甜诱发的荨麻疹。
Ann Intern Med. 1986 Feb;104(2):207-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-2-207.
6
Aspartame and susceptibility to headache.
N Engl J Med. 1987 Nov 5;317(19):1181-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198711053171903.
7
[Urticaria--angioedema induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics].[非甾体类抗炎镇痛药诱发的荨麻疹 - 血管性水肿]
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1984 May-Jun;12(3):179-88.
8
Sodium benzoate-induced repeated episodes of acute urticaria/angio-oedema: randomized controlled trial.苯甲酸钠诱发的急性荨麻疹/血管性水肿反复发作:随机对照试验
Br J Dermatol. 2004 Oct;151(4):898-902. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06095.x.
9
[Safety of reintroducing platelet-inhibitory doses of aspirin in patients with urticaria or angioedema induced by anti-inflammatory doses].[重新给予抗炎剂量引发的荨麻疹或血管性水肿患者血小板抑制剂量阿司匹林的安全性]
Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2009 Jan;136(1):15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.annder.2008.10.022. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
10
NSAID-sensitive antihistamine-induced urticaria/angioedema.非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)敏感的抗组胺药诱发的荨麻疹/血管性水肿。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2011;21(6):488-90.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of artificial sweeteners and rare sugars on the gut microbiome.人工甜味剂和稀有糖对肠道微生物群的影响。
Food Sci Biotechnol. 2024 Jul 2;33(9):2047-2064. doi: 10.1007/s10068-024-01597-x. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Aspartame-True or False? Narrative Review of Safety Analysis of General Use in Products.阿斯巴甜——是与非?关于其在产品中普遍使用的安全性分析的叙述性综述
Nutrients. 2021 Jun 7;13(6):1957. doi: 10.3390/nu13061957.
3
Consumption of artificially-sweetened soft drinks in pregnancy and risk of child asthma and allergic rhinitis.
孕期摄入人工甜味软饮料与儿童哮喘和过敏性鼻炎的风险。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057261. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
4
Sugar substitutes: Health controversy over perceived benefits.糖替代品:关于感知益处的健康争议。
J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2011 Oct;2(4):236-43. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.85936.
5
Adverse reactions to food additives.食品添加剂的不良反应。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2003 Jan;3(1):62-6. doi: 10.1007/s11882-003-0014-9.