Lahorra J M, Haaga J R, Stellato T, Flanigan T, Graham R
Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, OH 44106.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Jan;160(1):171-4. doi: 10.2214/ajr.160.1.8416619.
Percutaneous drainage of abscesses is an effective treatment, but the success rate is lower for abscesses that have septa and are multilocular. Several clinical and in vitro studies suggest urokinase may be useful in such cases. Our study was designed to determine the safety of urokinase administered into an abscess cavity during the course of percutaneous drainage.
Our study included 26 consecutive patients with 31 abscesses treated with percutaneous drainage. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18 or more than 95 years, CNS disorders (e.g., tumor, vascular problems), coagulation impairments, hepatic failure, pregnancy, and abscesses in the spleen, pancreas, or interloop area. Three doses were used: group 1 (nine patients), 1000 IU of urokinase per centimeter of abscess diameter; group 2 (11 patients), 2500 IU of urokinase per centimeter of abscess diameter; and group 3 (nine patients), 5000 IU of urokinase per centimeter of abscess diameter. These doses were administered every 8 hr for 3 days along with percutaneous drainage. Charts were reviewed to determine success and to detect adverse clinical events. Studies included sequential CT scans; serial serum determinations of hematocrit, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, platelet count, fibrinogen levels, and levels of fibrin degradation products; and serial laboratory analysis of purulent material for fibrinogen and fibrin degradation products. Percutaneous drainage was considered successful if no surgical intervention was required.
Our results showed no significant change in hematologic studies and no bleeding complications. Analysis of purulent material indicated that urokinase remained active in the abscess milieu. Drainage was successful in seven of 11 patients in group 1, all nine patients in group 2, and 10 of 11 patients in group 3. All eight abscesses with septa were successfully drained.
Intracavitary urokinase can be given safely during percutaneous drainage of an abscess, with no associated bleeding complications or changes in coagulation parameters.
经皮脓肿引流是一种有效的治疗方法,但对于有分隔且为多房性的脓肿,成功率较低。多项临床及体外研究表明,尿激酶可能对此类病例有用。我们的研究旨在确定在经皮引流过程中向脓肿腔内注入尿激酶的安全性。
我们的研究纳入了26例连续的患者,共31个脓肿接受经皮引流治疗。排除标准包括年龄小于18岁或大于95岁、中枢神经系统疾病(如肿瘤、血管问题)、凝血功能障碍、肝功能衰竭、妊娠以及脾脏、胰腺或肠袢间区域的脓肿。使用了三种剂量:第1组(9例患者),每厘米脓肿直径用1000国际单位尿激酶;第2组(11例患者),每厘米脓肿直径用2500国际单位尿激酶;第3组(9例患者),每厘米脓肿直径用5000国际单位尿激酶。这些剂量每8小时给药一次,并持续3天,同时进行经皮引流。查阅病历以确定治疗是否成功并检测不良临床事件。研究包括连续的CT扫描;连续测定血清中的血细胞比容、凝血酶原时间、部分凝血活酶时间、血小板计数、纤维蛋白原水平以及纤维蛋白降解产物水平;以及连续实验室分析脓性物质中的纤维蛋白原和纤维蛋白降解产物。如果无需手术干预,则认为经皮引流成功。
我们的结果显示血液学研究无显著变化,也无出血并发症。对脓性物质的分析表明尿激酶在脓肿环境中仍保持活性。第1组11例患者中有7例引流成功,第2组9例患者全部成功,第3组11例患者中有10例成功。所有8个有分隔的脓肿均成功引流。
在经皮脓肿引流过程中可安全地向腔内注入尿激酶,且无相关出血并发症或凝血参数变化。