Suppr超能文献

原发性肺癌所致心脏压塞及心包积液的处理

Cardiac tamponade caused by primary lung cancer and the management of pericardial effusion.

作者信息

Okamoto H, Shinkai T, Yamakido M, Saijo N

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Cancer. 1993 Jan 1;71(1):93-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930101)71:1<93::aid-cncr2820710115>3.0.co;2-r.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

Between 1978 and 1990, 51 cases of pericardial effusion secondary to lung cancer were treated at the National Cancer Center Hospital by creating a pericardial window, using the subxiphoid approach, that was connected to a water-sealed drainage system.

RESULTS

Most patients had advanced disease, such as distant metastasis (76%), pleural effusion (88%), and clinical Stage N2 or N3 disease (98%). Forty-five patients had cardiac tamponade, and six had no symptoms attributable to pericardial effusion. Cardiac tamponade was the initial manifestation of lung cancer in only 3 patients; it was a late manifestation in 48. Of those specimens that were examined cytologically, 92% had positive findings. The interval from creation of the pericardial window until removal of the drainage tube ranged from 4-135 days (median, 11 days). The interval was significantly longer in patients who previously had received thoracic radiation therapy (P < 0.05). The overall median survival was 80 days, and the 1-year survival rate was 10.5%. Postmortem examination showed that constrictive heart failure caused by pericardial lesions was the major contributory cause of death in 32% of patients. Using multivariate analysis, factors indicating a poor prognosis were: (1) the interval from the diagnosis of lung cancer to pericardial effusion development (P = 0.005) and (2) the absence of prior surgery (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

The creation of a pericardial window effectively treated pericardial effusion in 85% of cases. However, the role of intrapericardial instillation of anticancer or sclerosing agents was unclear in this retrospective analysis.

摘要

背景与方法

1978年至1990年间,日本国立癌症中心医院采用剑突下途径建立心包开窗并连接水封引流系统,治疗了51例继发于肺癌的心包积液患者。

结果

大多数患者病情已进展,如出现远处转移(76%)、胸腔积液(88%)以及临床分期为N2或N3期疾病(98%)。45例患者出现心脏压塞,6例患者无心包积液相关症状。心脏压塞仅在3例患者中为肺癌的首发表现;在48例患者中为晚期表现。在进行细胞学检查的标本中,92%有阳性发现。从建立心包开窗到拔除引流管的时间间隔为4 - 135天(中位数为11天)。先前接受过胸部放疗的患者,该时间间隔显著更长(P < 0.05)。总体中位生存期为80天,1年生存率为10.5%。尸检显示,心包病变导致的缩窄性心力衰竭是32%患者的主要死亡原因。多因素分析表明,预后不良的因素为:(1)从肺癌诊断到心包积液出现的时间间隔(P = 0.005)以及(2)未进行过先前手术(P = 0.007)。

结论

心包开窗术在85%的病例中有效治疗了心包积液。然而,在这项回顾性分析中,心包腔内注入抗癌药或硬化剂的作用尚不清楚。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验