Suppr超能文献

持续静脉输注西咪替丁可减少应激相关的上消化道出血,且不会增加肺炎的发生率。

Continuous intravenous cimetidine decreases stress-related upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage without promoting pneumonia.

作者信息

Martin L F, Booth F V, Karlstadt R G, Silverstein J H, Jacobs D M, Hampsey J, Bowman S C, D'Ambrosio C A, Rockhold F W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1993 Jan;21(1):19-30. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199301000-00009.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether a continuous i.v. infusion of cimetidine, a histamine-2 (H2) receptor antagonist, is needed to prevent upper gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage when compared with placebo and if that usage is associated with an increased risk of nosocomial pneumonia. Due to the importance of this latter issue, data were collected to examine the occurrence rate of nosocomial pneumonia under the conditions of this study.

DESIGN

A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to receive cimetidine (n = 65) as an iv infusion of 50 to 100 mg/hr or placebo (n = 66).

SETTING

Intensive care units in 20 institutions.

PATIENTS

Critically ill patients (n = 131), all of whom had at least one acute stress condition that previously had been associated with the development of upper GI hemorrhage.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Samples of gastric fluid from nasogastric aspirates were collected every 2 hrs for measurement of pH and were examined for the presence of blood. Upper GI hemorrhage was defined as bright red blood or persistent (continuing for > 8 hrs) "coffee ground material" in the nasogastric aspirate. Baseline chest radiographs were performed and sputum specimens were collected from all patients, and those patients without clear signs of pneumonia (positive chest radiograph, positive cough, fever) at baseline were followed prospectively for the development of pneumonia while receiving the study medication. Cimetidine-infused patients experienced significantly (p = .009) less upper GI hemorrhage than placebo-infused patients: nine (14%) of 65 cimetidine vs. 22 (33%) of 66 placebo patients. Cimetidine patients demonstrated significantly (p = .0001) higher mean intragastric pH (5.7 vs. 3.9), and had intragastric pH values at > 4.0 for a significantly (p = .0001) higher mean percentage of time (82% vs. 41%) than placebo patients. Differences in pH variables were not found between patients who had upper GI hemorrhage and those patients who did not, although there was no patient in the cimetidine group who bled with a pH < 3.5 compared with 11 such patients in the placebo group. Also, the upper GI hemorrhage rate in patients with one risk factor (23%) was similar to that rate in patients with two or more risk factors (25%). Of the 56 cimetidine-infused patients and 61 placebo-infused patients who did not have pneumonia at baseline, no cimetidine-infused patient developed pneumonia while four (7%) placebo-infused patients developed pneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS

The continuous i.v. infusion of cimetidine was highly effective in controlling intragastric pH and in preventing stress-related upper GI hemorrhage in critically ill patients without increasing their risk of developing nosocomial pneumonia. While the number of risk factors and intragastric pH may have pathogenic importance in the development of upper GI hemorrhage, neither the risk factors nor the intragastric pH was predictive. Therefore, short-term administration of continuously infused cimetidine offers benefits in patients who have sustained major surgery, trauma, burns, hypotension, sepsis, or single organ failure.

摘要

目的

确定与安慰剂相比,持续静脉输注西咪替丁(一种组胺 - 2(H2)受体拮抗剂)是否有必要预防上消化道(GI)出血,以及这种用法是否与医院获得性肺炎风险增加相关。鉴于后一问题的重要性,收集数据以检查本研究条件下医院获得性肺炎的发生率。

设计

一项多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。

干预措施

患者被随机分配接受西咪替丁(n = 65),以每小时50至100毫克的速度静脉输注,或安慰剂(n = 66)。

地点

20家机构的重症监护病房。

患者

危重症患者(n = 131),所有患者至少有一种先前与上消化道出血发生相关的急性应激状况。

测量与主要结果

每2小时收集一次鼻胃吸出物的胃液样本以测量pH值,并检查是否有血液。上消化道出血定义为鼻胃吸出物中出现鲜红色血液或持续性(持续超过8小时)“咖啡渣样物质”。对所有患者进行基线胸部X光检查并收集痰液样本,对基线时无明确肺炎体征(胸部X光阳性、咳嗽阳性、发热)的患者在接受研究药物治疗期间前瞻性地随访肺炎的发生情况。接受西咪替丁治疗的患者上消化道出血明显少于接受安慰剂治疗的患者(p = 0.009):65例接受西咪替丁治疗的患者中有9例(14%)出血,而66例接受安慰剂治疗的患者中有22例(33%)出血。西咪替丁组患者的平均胃内pH值显著更高(5.7对3.9),且胃内pH值> 4.0的平均时间百分比显著更高(82%对41%)(p = 0.0001)。上消化道出血患者与未出血患者之间未发现pH变量存在差异,尽管西咪替丁组中没有pH < 3.5时出血的患者,而安慰剂组中有11例此类患者。此外,有一个危险因素的患者上消化道出血率(23%)与有两个或更多危险因素的患者的出血率(25%)相似。在基线时无肺炎的56例接受西咪替丁治疗的患者和61例接受安慰剂治疗的患者中,接受西咪替丁治疗的患者无一人发生肺炎,而接受安慰剂治疗的患者中有4例(7%)发生肺炎。

结论

持续静脉输注西咪替丁在控制胃内pH值和预防危重症患者应激相关上消化道出血方面非常有效,且不会增加其发生医院获得性肺炎的风险。虽然危险因素的数量和胃内pH值在上消化道出血的发生中可能具有致病重要性,但危险因素和胃内pH值均无预测性。因此,短期持续输注西咪替丁对经历大手术、创伤、烧伤、低血压、败血症或单器官衰竭的患者有益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验