Ong E, Ciuffreda K J, Tannen B
SUNY/State College of Optometry, Department of Vision Sciences, NY 10010.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993 Jan;34(1):194-204.
To conduct a comparative study of static accommodative function between individuals with normal vision (n = 10) and patients with congenital nystagmus (n = 12).
The component contribution to monocular steady-state accommodation (slope of the accommodative stimulus/response function, accommodative controller gain, tonic accommodation, and depth-of-focus) was assessed subjectively using a Hartinger coincidence-optometer, except for depth-of-focus, which was determined psychophysically.
The group mean slope for the patients with nystagmus was not significantly different from that found in the normal subjects. However, their variability was markedly increased. Therefore, the patients with nystagmus were divided into three subgroups with regard to the normal accommodative stimulus/response function slope criterion. The majority of patients with nystagmus (n = 10) exhibited slopes that were outside of normal limits, being greater than (n = 4) or less than (n = 6) the normal range. Depth-of-focus was the only parameter found to be significantly different between the normal and the nystagmus groups. When the nystagmus group was divided with respect to etiology--ie, albinotic (n = 4) versus idiopathic (n = 8)--there were no significant differences found for the various accommodative parameters.
We speculate that the primary component contributing to the anomalous accommodative behavior was the increased depth-of-focus, with this perhaps being related to abnormal fixational eye movements and eccentric fixation, and more generally related to overall reduced sensitivity resulting from the early abnormal visual experience.
对正常视力个体(n = 10)和先天性眼球震颤患者(n = 12)的静态调节功能进行比较研究。
除了通过心理物理学方法确定的焦深外,使用哈廷格重合验光仪主观评估单眼稳态调节的组成部分贡献(调节刺激/反应函数的斜率、调节控制器增益、张力性调节和焦深)。
眼球震颤患者的组平均斜率与正常受试者无显著差异。然而,他们的变异性明显增加。因此,根据正常调节刺激/反应函数斜率标准,将眼球震颤患者分为三个亚组。大多数眼球震颤患者(n = 10)的斜率超出正常范围,大于(n = 4)或小于(n = 6)正常范围。焦深是正常组和眼球震颤组之间唯一发现有显著差异的参数。当根据病因将眼球震颤组分为白化病(n = 4)与特发性(n = 8)时,各种调节参数未发现显著差异。
我们推测,导致异常调节行为的主要因素是焦深增加,这可能与异常的注视眼运动和偏心注视有关,更普遍地与早期异常视觉体验导致的整体敏感性降低有关。