Mendolia M, Kleck R E
Department of Psychology, Dartmouth College.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Feb;64(2):283-92. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.64.2.283.
In Study 1, 30 male and 30 female undergraduates viewed an affect-neutral stimulus and a stress-inducing stimulus. Ss then talked about either their emotional reactions to the stressful stimulus (emotion condition), the sequence of events within it (fact condition), or the sequence of events within the neutral stimulus (distraction condition). Emotion-condition Ss were more autonomically aroused during a 2nd exposure to the stressful stimulus than were fact-condition Ss. In Study 2, 48 hr separated Ss' talking about their 1st exposure to the stressful stimulus from their 2nd exposure to it. Emotion-condition Ss had lower levels of autonomic arousal while viewing the stimulus again and reported more positive affect after watching it than did fact-condition Ss. These results are discussed in the context of cognitive appraisal, perceptual-motor, and self-disclosure views of emotion.
在研究1中，30名男性和30名女性大学生观看了一个情感中立的刺激物和一个诱发压力的刺激物。然后，被试者谈论他们对压力刺激的情绪反应（情绪条件）、其中的事件顺序（事实条件）或中性刺激中的事件顺序（分心条件）。与事实条件组的被试者相比，情绪条件组的被试者在第二次接触压力刺激时自主唤醒程度更高。在研究2中，被试者第一次接触压力刺激和第二次接触压力刺激之间间隔48小时。与事实条件组的被试者相比，情绪条件组的被试者在再次观看刺激物时自主唤醒水平较低，并且在观看后报告的积极情绪更多。这些结果在情绪的认知评估、感知运动和自我表露观点的背景下进行了讨论。
