Burt J S, Walker M B, Humphreys M S, Tehan G
Department of Psychology, University of Queensland, Australia.
Mem Cognit. 1993 Jan;21(1):125-37. doi: 10.3758/bf03211171.
Three experiments assessed the effects of prime-processing instructions on associative priming in word identification and episodic memory for primes. In Experiment 1, groups instructed to read the prime silently or generate silently an associate of the prime showed a larger accuracy benefit for related over unrelated targets than did a group that decided whether an asterisk was to the right or left of the prime. The asterisk-search group showed a weaker repetition effect on a subsequent identification test of primes, indicating that the weaker priming in this group was a result of poorer perceptual processing. On a cued-recall test for primes, the generate group was superior to the other groups. In Experiment 2, we found that with weak prime-target associations, priming was comparable for read and generate groups and stronger than estimated for a guessing strategy, on the basis of single predictions made from each prime by an additional group. In Experiment 3, we demonstrated that the read and generate instructions produced similar mispriming and inhibitory effects. The results suggest that the depths of prime-processing manipulations do not have parallel effects on priming and episodic memory, and that associative priming in word identification, as in other tasks, may involve an expectancy process.
三项实验评估了启动加工指令对单词识别中的联想启动以及启动刺激的情景记忆的影响。在实验1中,被指示默读启动刺激或默默生成启动刺激的联想词的组,相比于判断星号在启动刺激右侧还是左侧的组,在相关目标词与不相关目标词上表现出更大的准确性优势。星号搜索组在随后的启动刺激识别测试中表现出较弱的重复效应,这表明该组较弱的启动效应是感知加工较差的结果。在启动刺激的线索回忆测试中,生成组优于其他组。在实验2中,我们发现,对于启动刺激与目标词关联较弱的情况,阅读组和生成组的启动效应相当,且比根据另一组基于每个启动刺激做出的单一预测所估计的猜测策略更强。在实验3中,我们证明了阅读指令和生成指令产生了相似的错误启动和抑制效应。结果表明,启动加工操作的深度对启动效应和情景记忆没有平行影响,并且单词识别中的联想启动,与其他任务一样,可能涉及预期过程。